Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

25942 - added future effective state to entity states enum #272

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

JazzarKarim
Copy link
Collaborator

Issue #: /bcgov/entity#25942

Description of changes:
This is what things are going to look like in the table:
image

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the business-filings-ui license (Apache 2.0).

Copy link
Collaborator

@TVWerdal TVWerdal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ export enum EntityStates {
AWAITING_REVIEW = 'AWAITING_REVIEW',
CHANGE_REQUESTED = 'CHANGE_REQUESTED',
DRAFT = 'DRAFT',
FUTURE_EFFECTIVE = 'FUTURE_EFFECTIVE',
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this an actual state (from Legal API), or is it more of a pseudo-state (computed by you)? If the latter then see if you can extend the enum right in the BRD code.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@JazzarKarim JazzarKarim Feb 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's kinda more of the latter. Deal, going to leave this PR open for now and see if I can handle this there.

@JazzarKarim
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closing this PR as it's not needed. Ref: bcgov/business-ui#67 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants