Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(GUI) Improvements on metadata inquiry for remote exports. #89

Closed
bengtmartensson opened this issue Dec 27, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

(GUI) Improvements on metadata inquiry for remote exports. #89

bengtmartensson opened this issue Dec 27, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@bengtmartensson
Copy link
Owner

  1. There should be a possiblity to "bail out" on the first popup, avoiding the rest,
  2. Do not inquiry at all for export protocols not supporting meta data (e.g. ict),
  3. Remember once inquired answers.
  4. Having one panel for all the information (df. (Girr) New class Remote.MetaData #102). (This will make 1. irrelevant.)
@bengtmartensson
Copy link
Owner Author

Wait for #102.

@bengtmartensson bengtmartensson changed the title Improvements on metadata inquiry for remote exports. (GUI) Improvements on metadata inquiry for remote exports. Feb 25, 2016
bengtmartensson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2016
Use this class in the API calls, instead of name, manufacturer, etc.
Fixes 3. of the requirements in #89.
@bengtmartensson
Copy link
Owner Author

Req. 3. implemented. Req. 2. requires a property like "usesMetadata" in export format. More effort than usage it seems.

@bengtmartensson
Copy link
Owner Author

It is probably safe to assume that (I)RemoteSetExporter (multiSignal == true) uses metadata; the other does not.

@bengtmartensson bengtmartensson added this to the Milestone 4. milestone May 9, 2016
bengtmartensson added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2016
Exportformats: new function supportsMetaData. Changes in exportformats.xsd,
and exportformats.xml.
@bengtmartensson
Copy link
Owner Author

Fixed by previous commits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant