Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Ability to get withdrawal fee estimate #284

Merged

Conversation

akwodkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds /widthdrawals/fee-estimate resource.

See: https://docs.prime.coinbase.com/#fee-estimate

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #284 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #284   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines          483       486    +3     
  Branches        30        30           
=========================================
+ Hits           483       486    +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
#unittests 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/withdraw/WithdrawAPI.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@bennycode
Copy link
Owner

Great contribution! I just fixed the URL to Fee Estimate. Green light for merging if you are okay with it?

@bennycode bennycode self-requested a review October 22, 2020 10:43
@akwodkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Go ahead 😄

@bennycode bennycode merged commit 4e94097 into bennycode:master Oct 22, 2020
@akwodkiewicz akwodkiewicz deleted the feature/add-network-fee-estimate branch October 22, 2020 11:05
@bennycode
Copy link
Owner

It's now released with v2.13.0. I also changed the default branch to "main".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants