Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use heartbeat instead of advisory lock to track processes #853

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bensheldon
Copy link
Owner

@bensheldon bensheldon commented Feb 19, 2023

Connects to #831.

Capsule extracted in #861

@bensheldon bensheldon temporarily deployed to goodjob-process-manager-rpjeqr February 19, 2023 16:39 Inactive
@bensheldon bensheldon temporarily deployed to goodjob-process-manager-rpjeqr February 21, 2023 19:15 Inactive
@bensheldon bensheldon temporarily deployed to goodjob-process-manager-rpjeqr February 21, 2023 19:28 Inactive
@bensheldon bensheldon changed the title Use heartbeat instead of advisory lock to track processes; extract executors to "Capsule" container Use heartbeat instead of advisory lock to track processes Feb 28, 2023
@bensheldon bensheldon closed this Mar 8, 2023
@bensheldon bensheldon deleted the process-manager branch March 8, 2023 15:20
@bensheldon
Copy link
Owner Author

Closing for now because the Capsule was extracted in #861 and I'll do a clean redo of the Process record part.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant