Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pull] master from torvalds:master #486

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2021
Merged

[pull] master from torvalds:master #486

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2021

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Mar 15, 2021

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

Alexey Dobriyan and others added 2 commits March 14, 2021 14:33
Doing a

	prctl(PR_SET_MM, PR_SET_MM_AUXV, addr, 1);

will copy 1 byte from userspace to (quite big) on-stack array
and then stash everything to mm->saved_auxv.
AT_NULL terminator will be inserted at the very end.

/proc/*/auxv handler will find that AT_NULL terminator
and copy original stack contents to userspace.

This devious scheme requires CAP_SYS_RESOURCE.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Mar 15, 2021
@pull pull bot merged commit 1e28eed into bergwolf:master Mar 15, 2021
pull bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2021
Fix checkpatch errors:

  ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
  #484: FILE: spi-rockchip.c:484:
  +^I        | CR0_BHT_8BIT << CR0_BHT_OFFSET$
  ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
  #485: FILE: spi-rockchip.c:485:
  +^I        | CR0_SSD_ONE  << CR0_SSD_OFFSET$
  ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
  #486: FILE: spi-rockchip.c:486:
  +^I        | CR0_EM_BIG   << CR0_EM_OFFSET;$

Signed-off-by: Jay Fang <f.fangjian@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1616566602-13894-11-git-send-email-f.fangjian@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
pull bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2024
Like commit 1cf3bfc ("bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs")
for s390x, add support for 64-bit pointers to kfuncs for LoongArch.
Since the infrastructure is already implemented in BPF core, the only
thing need to be done is to override bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call().

Before this change, several test_verifier tests failed:

  # ./test_verifier | grep # | grep FAIL
  #119/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with non-scalar FAIL
  #120/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with nesting depth > 4 FAIL
  #121/p calls: invalid kfunc call: ptr_to_mem to struct with FAM FAIL
  #122/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->type != PTR_TO_CTX FAIL
  #123/p calls: invalid kfunc call: void * not allowed in func proto without mem size arg FAIL
  #124/p calls: trigger reg2btf_ids[reg->type] for reg->type > __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX FAIL
  #125/p calls: invalid kfunc call: reg->off must be zero when passed to release kfunc FAIL
  #126/p calls: invalid kfunc call: don't match first member type when passed to release kfunc FAIL
  #127/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with negative offset FAIL
  #128/p calls: invalid kfunc call: PTR_TO_BTF_ID with variable offset FAIL
  #129/p calls: invalid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
  #130/p calls: valid kfunc call: referenced arg needs refcounted PTR_TO_BTF_ID FAIL
  #486/p map_kptr: ref: reference state created and released on xchg FAIL

This is because the kfuncs in the loaded module are far away from
__bpf_call_base:

  ffff800002009440 t bpf_kfunc_call_test_fail1    [bpf_testmod]
  9000000002e128d8 T __bpf_call_base

The offset relative to __bpf_call_base does NOT fit in s32, which breaks
the assumption in BPF core. Enable bpf_jit_supports_far_kfunc_call() lifts
this limit.

Note that to reproduce the above result, tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
should be applied, and run the test with JIT enabled, unpriv BPF enabled.

With this change, the test_verifier tests now all passed:

  # ./test_verifier
  ...
  Summary: 777 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant