We now have co-maintainers / State of the project

[berstend]

Hi all,

unfortunately I've been unable to maintain this project for the past months, due to unforeseen reasons (more long-form explanation here).

Given the popularity of puppeteer-extra this had quite an impact, with no PRs and updates being merged and published.

Despite things going back to normal on my end I'm therefore looking for contributors who might be interested in taking on a more active role on this project (triaging issues, merging PRs, pushing new versions). Especially stealth & detection evasion techniques are fast-paced and quite the burden to maintain for a single maintainer.

In order to ensure the viability and longevity of puppeteer-extra it's crucial that updates don't hinge on the availability of a single person. Given the subject matter this project also attracts a lot of less experienced developers as well, resulting in a lot of "noise" in the issue tracker that still needs to be managed.

Let me know if you'd be interested in supporting this project more actively, I'll also reach out to contributors that stood out in the past. :)

Thanks!

edit: we now have 6 awesome collaborators who stepped up. 🎉 If you feel you'd be interested in participating as well just mention it here. :-)

---

Update: I'm currently doing the following:

• Getting up to speed with the latest developments (PRs, Playwright, etc)
• Make CI go green and merge in PRs to make puppeteer-extra compatible with Puppeteer 5 asap (Support puppeteer 5 #228, Fixing issue with the setMaxListeners #240) - Done: fix: Compat with Puppeteer 5 #243
• Reviewing & simplifying the CI setup to be more robust (extremely important if more people are involved)
• Preparing to add contributors (Done: We now have co-maintainers / State of the project #238 (comment)) and setting up PR merging/review flows in Github

[brunogaspar]

I'm interested to help, since i was planing to release a super light version with mainly the stealth techniques and some minor improvements, but, since the intention is to move forward here, i don't see the need to have a separate package.

But either way, having the project moving forward would be quite nice :)

Thanks!

[itsdarrylnorris]

I am interested on co-maintaining.

[andrew-healey]

I'm also interested, mostly because I want to ensure that puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth evasions are added as quickly as bot detection software adds new detection methods (to prevent #227 from happening again).

[prescience-data]

It's definitely become a critical package for a lot of people, so having small, experienced team vs single person risk will be incredible and really add to the pace of improvements!

[jozsi]

I'm interested if we make it playwright compatible - as I am moving slowly away from puppeteer.

LE: Apparently there is an issue (#144) for this and @brunogaspar made a fork 🎉

[Niek]

I'd also be interested in helping out. Getting up-to-date with Puppeteer 5 is most important right now.

I started a similar package for Playwright (https://github.com/Niek/playwright-addons) but if this project is active again it might make sense to add Playwright support in this repo.

[alex-yliu]

I'm interested in helping out. Count me in

[berstend]

Awesome, thanks a lot for the interest and re-assuring feedback - much appreciated. :-)

I'm getting up to speed with the current state of things (e.g. playwright) this weekend and start making adjustments. Given that we can lock PR merging to require 2 approvals I don't see an issue inviting devs who haven't contributed code before.

@Niek - great to see you're interested :-)

I will update this ticket with a public list of next steps/todos once I have an overview.

Just to clarify: I'll still be active and involved in the project, given the speed of progress required in this space it's just the right time to open things up.

Looking forward to the massive updates that'll follow. 🚀

[moltar]

I’m interested as well. Can help with the CI setup also. Have a lot of experience with GH Actions. We can setup Semantic Release to auto publish to NPM.

[berstend]

I’m interested as well. Can help with the CI setup also. Have a lot of experience with GH Actions. We can setup Semantic Release to auto publish to NPM.

Sounds good @moltar - definitely makes sense to migrate to GH actions. Being a monorepo using lerna makes this project a bit special but I had a quick look yesterday and found this writeup that uses changesets to create a publishing PR. It looks like the changeset generation needs to be triggered locally but I like that publishing to npm is conscious effort by merging the changeset PR.

What do you think of this approach? :-)

[berstend]

FYI: I've started adding collaborators, currently: @Niek @brunogaspar @jozsi @moltar @itsdarrylnorris @Sesamestrong

@YunfengLiu I haven't added you as a collaborator yet as your GH profile looked a bit empty, thanks for stepping up and feel free to participate in the project though. :-)

The master branch is protected and requires PRs with 2 reviews (tbd) to be merged into.

The immediate next steps from my side:

• Prepare everything for a Puppeteer 5 compatible release (the Travis CI setup is a bit wonky and tests fail occasionally, want to fix that first before pushing) - Done: Support puppeteer 5 #228,fix: Compat with Puppeteer 5 #243
• Migrate to better CI setup using GH actions + auto publishing to NPM
• Discuss next steps (e.g. playwright, general roadmap), fine-tune Github (e.g. ticket templates, contributing guidelines, bots) and workflows
• Merge/review pending PRs, triage/merge/label open tickets

Let me know if I forgot something important. :-)

[berstend]

New Puppeteer 5 compatible versions (still backwards compatible) are now on npm. Had to fight Travis a bit to get the tests green and look forward to replacing all that with a new GH actions based flow with auto-publishing. 😄

I feel setting up a robust new CI pipeline is one of the most important next steps as it's affecting all future work & collaboration.

Unsorted things I've additionally noticed during catching up:

• Dependencies need to be updated (could be automated in the future with e.g. renovate bot dependabot native)
• The issue tracker is in disarray and needs cleanup (we need issue templates, could make sense to add e.g. stalebot as well)
• The stealth and recaptcha plugins need some love (also crosschecking the pending PRs)
  • stealth could benefit from a shared library with the best implementation to overwrite/monkey patch native APIs without leaving traces
  • we can quite easily add support for the new hcaptcha in recaptcha as it's similar and 2captcha supports solving it
• It should be possible to make puppeteer-extra compatible with playwright on a first glance, haven't looked more closely at it though
• Linting & style guidelines could be streamlined across the project, there are sometimes differences between plugins
• It could make sense to document common newcomer questions in a canonical way (e.g. implications of headful vs headless, chrome vs chromium, how to use headful in docker, etc) in the wiki or an .md file
• Github Actions is amazing, we could use it to trigger documentation updates (yarn docs) on every push automatically among other things

If anyone is interested in spearheading one of these efforts or has other things just mention it. :-)

[Niek]

Regarding dependency management: I have good experience with dependabot, it's part of GitHub now and very well integrated. If you want i'll make the PR. Edit: oops, I see you're already using it, but as an external service (not in .github/dependabot.yml). Might make sense to move it internally.

And totally agree on GH actions: for stuff like docs on packaging it's really nice.

[berstend]

I see you're already using it, but as an external service (not in .github/dependabot.yml). Might make sense to move it internally.

Yeah, I tried setting it up a while ago but ran into some issues (monorepo, CI not being reliable) and left it there as other things came up. :-) Back then renovate bot was supposedly suited better for monorepos, but that might've changed since then.

I've just removed the Dependabot and Renovate bot app integrations to have a clean slate, feel free to add proper support for either one of them (dependabot looks like a winner though, due to 1st class GH integration). :-)

[berstend]

Thanks for reviewing/merging in PRs @Niek @brunogaspar 👍

Until we've moved to Github actions I'll publish the new package versions manually.

Everything in master (up to dc8b902, #165) is now live:

Successfully published:
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-adblocker@2.11.5
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-anonymize-ua@2.2.11
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-block-resources@2.2.6
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-click-and-wait@2.2.6
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-devtools@2.2.11
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-flash@2.2.7
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-font-size@2.2.6
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-recaptcha@3.1.13
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-repl@2.2.6
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth@2.4.12
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-user-data-dir@2.2.6
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin-user-preferences@2.2.6
 - puppeteer-extra-plugin@3.1.6
 - puppeteer-extra@3.1.12

edit, a few more changes went live.

[ghost]

Another bit of food for thought - A lot of people seem to be switching to Brave browser which allows for "Tips" https://brave.com/tips/ Would be great to be able to Tip the project! Either that or a Patreon etc?

[evading-bot-detection]

This is great news, looking forward to the updates.

[xD-saleem]

I'm interested in helping out and help maintaining. Count me in

[momala454]

you still don't want to make a private location to discuss ? i don't really want to give more infos to the opposite ^^

[brunogaspar]

Why not make a private discord server and invite us for now? That way is easier to share this stuff and also discuss other improvements or changes before attempting any pull requests.

[berstend]

Why not make a private discord server and invite us for now? That way is easier to share this stuff and also discuss other improvements or changes before attempting any pull requests.

I like the idea of it, let's see if there's enough interest for it. Will set up a discord over the weekend, not sure how to best send out invites though (Github really needs a messaging feature) 🤔

edit: Actually we can just make it public with a private channel, lol

[brunogaspar]

edit: Actually we can just make it public with a private channel, lol

Yes, that would work :)

[itsdarrylnorris]

I love the idea of the discord server.

[jozsi]

I'd go with Slack instead.

[berstend]

I'd go with Slack instead.

Yeah, I was wondering about that as well. Personally I have a slight preference towards Slack (due to being more involved in existing Slack channels already). :-)

I was trying to figure out what's more common in the (open source) community and the results are bit inconclusive 😄

Also It could make sense to set up a more generic "browser automation/scraping enthusiasts" chat to discuss things (with internal channels for our needs), as I'm not sure how long-lived the puppeteer-extra project name will be (with future playwright support on the horizon, etc). :-)

[moltar]

I'd say Discord channels are becoming more popular these days, especially for the frontend stuff.

[brunogaspar]

I use both, but the main reason for suggesting Discord is the trend of open source projects and communities moving to it from Slack.

But either way works fine. Unless someone wants to use IRC or perhaps Skype? 😅

[itsdarrylnorris]

I ended up creating a generic Discord server for web scraping. I have also created a public channel for "puppeteer-extra," so we can chat about puppeteer-extra. If needed, I can make the puppeteer-extra channel private but is public for now.

[moltar]

I've joined, but I am not seeing any rooms.

[moltar]

just "welcome"

[itsdarrylnorris]

Hey @moltar ,

The welcome room should have the instructions on how to give you access to the rest of the rooms. You need to accept the guidelines.

[berstend]

@itsdarrylnorris yay to duplicate efforts 😄

I've set up a discord here: https://discord.gg/vz7PeKk

We need private channels and a certain structure to get the most use from this. :-)
Ping me to get a Maintainer or Insider roles (to discuss things more privately).

Edit: To be added to the private Insider discussion channels we require the user to prove their Github username ownership (must be a user who's been active in our repo before) - just ping any Moderator who's online for that :-)

[berstend]

I'm closing this issue, as we're pushing progress again with full steam now. :-)

Since my initial call for support the people who offered to help did triage & close issues, reviewed & created pull requests, participated in community discussions and worked on new things and fixes - thanks a lot 👍

In addition the community discord is quite active and serves it's purpose.

We also shipped a couple of updates and have large rewrites & improvements in the works (#291, #292) as well as internal projects.

My local playwright-extra proof-of-concept takes shape as well, so the future looks bright 😄