Problems using PIXI.Application

[roman-kripton]

Hello, I've run into this problem. What if I don't use PIXI.Application ?

[bfanger]

Set __PIXI_APP__ to an object that looks like an PIXI.Application

May I ask why you dont use an Application?

[Outfire]

Hi. Thank you for the great extension.
I also don't use an Application. Because we have our structure for rendering object. All what I can is provide root container for rendering.
Do you need only stage from an Application or any other additional infoarmation and methods?

[Outfire]

I found that you need "stage" or in my case root container, renderer for "width, height, resolution" and "view" which you also can take from renderer.
Created an object with these three values and everything is works now.
And new design is not for me, previous one had more funcionality)

[MaksimPozharskiy]

I did as advised @Outfire , instead of app I put stage and devtools started working.

But the items are not showing.
P.S. I'm not using the latest version of Pixi , i use v2.2.9

[Tezza48]

This is also an issue for me, It's pretty common that PIXI apps don't use Application. As per the docs it's only a convenience class.

https://pixijs.download/release/docs/PIXI.Application.html

It boots up some stuff that we just don't need or have alternatives for.

Something quick and helpful would be pulling out your required fields from Application instead and a suggestion in Instructions.svelte.

Something like

globalThis.__PIXI_APP__ = {
    stage: ...,
    renderer: ...,
    ...
}

[goldenratio]

Hey,
Thanks for the update and moving to Svelte :D nice stuff.
is it worth checking for window.PIXI to be backwards compatible?
https://github.com/bfanger/pixi-inspector/blob/v0.9.6/src/services/DevConnection.js#L12

[gatsinski]

I've tested 5459a57 locally and it works like a charm. Thanks, @bfanger for the quick response.

[bfanger]

2.1.0 is submitted to the chrome store