Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue while using Sorting option #1791

Closed
Rokshan2016 opened this issue Nov 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Issue while using Sorting option #1791

Rokshan2016 opened this issue Nov 1, 2017 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Rokshan2016
Copy link

HI,
I used cannoli for alignment:
Data : SRR1517848_1.fastq , SRR1517848_.fastq

I used this command to make interleaved fastq : ./cannoli-submit interleaveFastq > SRR1517848.fastq

Then I use this command for alignment : ./cannoli-submit --driver-memory 3g --executor-memory 10g -- bwa -bwa_path /home/rokshan.jahan/adamproject/bwa-master/bwa -single hdfs://ip-10-48-3-5.ips.local:8020/genomics/cannoli_test/SRR1517848.fastq hdfs://ip-10-48-3-5.ips.local:8020/user/rokshan.jahan/SRR1517848.adam SRR1517848 -index /home/rokshan.jahan/adamproject/reference/ref/Homo_sapiens_assembly38.fasta -sequence_dictionary hdfs://ip-10-48-3-5.ips.local:8020/user/rokshan.jahan/data/Homo_sapiens_assembly38.dict -force_load_ifastq

I got the output successfully in adam format : SRR1517848.adam

I run adam command on this file :

./adam-submit transformAlignments hdfs://ip-10-48-3-5.ips.local:8020/user/rokshan.jahan/SRR1517848.adam hdfs://ip-10-48-3-5.ips.local:8020/user/rokshan.jahan/SRR1517848_new.adam -sort_reads -mark_duplicate_reads -recalibrate_base_qualities

Its giving me this error :

HLA-DRB1*16:02:01->11005, 3365}.
at scala.Predef$.require(Predef.scala:233)
at org.bdgenomics.adam.rdd.read.AlignmentRecordRDD$$anonfun$sortReadsByReferencePositionAndIndex$1$$anonfun$apply$10.apply(AlignmentRecordRDD.scala:918)
at org.bdgenomics.adam.rdd.read.AlignmentRecordRDD$$anonfun$sortReadsByReferencePositionAndIndex$1$$anonfun$apply$10.apply(AlignmentRecordRDD.scala:915)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$keyBy$1$$anonfun$apply$56.apply(RDD.scala:1492)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$keyBy$1$$anonfun$apply$56.apply(RDD.scala:1492)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:328)
at scala.collection.Iterator$$anon$11.next(Iterator.scala:328)
at org.apache.spark.util.random.SamplingUtils$.reservoirSampleAndCount(SamplingUtils.scala:42)
at org.apache.spark.RangePartitioner$$anonfun$9.apply(Partitioner.scala:261)
at org.apache.spark.RangePartitioner$$anonfun$9.apply(Partitioner.scala:259)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndex$1$$anonfun$apply$22.apply(RDD.scala:745)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD$$anonfun$mapPartitionsWithIndex$1$$anonfun$apply$22.apply(RDD.scala:745)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.MapPartitionsRDD.compute(MapPartitionsRDD.scala:38)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.computeOrReadCheckpoint(RDD.scala:306)
at org.apache.spark.rdd.RDD.iterator(RDD.scala:270)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.ResultTask.runTask(ResultTask.scala:66)
at org.apache.spark.scheduler.Task.run(Task.scala:89)
at org.apache.spark.executor.Executor$TaskRunner.run(Executor.scala:242)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

Any suggestion will be really helpful.

Thanks

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

Hi @Rokshan2016! This issue means that there was a read in your file that had a contig name that wasn't in your sequence dictionary. Do you still have the full error message? It should contain the contig name for the offending read.

@fnothaft
Copy link
Member

fnothaft commented Mar 7, 2018

I don't think there's more action here; please reopen if needed.

@fnothaft fnothaft closed this as completed Mar 7, 2018
@heuermh heuermh added this to the 0.24.0 milestone Mar 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants