Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix link anchors and other issues in readthedocs #1822

Closed
heuermh opened this issue Dec 7, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

Fix link anchors and other issues in readthedocs #1822

heuermh opened this issue Dec 7, 2017 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@heuermh
Copy link
Member

heuermh commented Dec 7, 2017

Some link anchors and other formatting styles were broken after conversion to rst.

File pull requests against this issue for these and other issues with the new documentation hosted at http://adam.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

E.g.

a known variation database (e.g., dbSNP). {#known-snps}
See candidate generation and realignment. {#known-indels}
While the `transformAlignments <#transformAlignments>`__ command

Regarding Pygments styles, I prefer lovelace and arduino over the default.

@heuermh heuermh added this to the 0.23.0 milestone Dec 7, 2017
@heuermh heuermh self-assigned this Dec 7, 2017
@antonkulaga
Copy link
Contributor

You have a small formating issue at http://adam.readthedocs.io/en/latest/architecture/overview/ with \end{itemize}

@antonkulaga
Copy link
Contributor

at http://adam.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/joins/ it is better to separate right and inner by the line on the pic

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Dec 12, 2017

You have a small formating issue at http://adam.readthedocs.io/en/latest/architecture/overview/ with \end{itemize}

Thanks, I think we fixed that in #1827 already.

at http://adam.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/joins/ it is better to separate right and inner by the line on the pic

Good suggestion, thanks again.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Dec 13, 2017

Fixed by #1827

@heuermh heuermh closed this as completed Dec 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants