Update PhyloAcc recipe #51224
Update PhyloAcc recipe #51224
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
recipes/phyloacc/meta.yaml (1)
Missing Integration of
run_test.shin Build ProcessThe
run_test.shscript is present in therecipes/phyloaccdirectory but is not invoked withinbuild.sh. This means that the new testing strategy is not integrated into the build workflow, potentially leading to untested builds.
- Recommendation: Update
recipes/phyloacc/build.shto executerun_test.shas part of the build process to ensure that tests are run automatically.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-63: Summary of changes and request for additional informationThe changes to this recipe are minimal but potentially impactful:
- The build number has been correctly incremented.
- The testing strategy has been modified, removing previous test commands and adding
wgetas a requirement.These changes align with the PR objective of enhancing the testing framework. However, to ensure the reliability and functionality of the package, please provide more information about the new testing strategy:
- Is there a separate test script (e.g.,
run_test.sh) that will be usingwget?- How will the package's functionality be verified in the absence of the previous test commands?
- Can you provide an overview of the new testing process and how it improves upon the previous one?
This information will help in understanding the full scope of the testing enhancements and ensure that the package maintains its quality and reliability.
To check for any additional files that might be part of the new testing strategy, please run:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all files in the recipe directory fd -t f . recipes/phyloaccLength of output: 153
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the contents of run_test.sh cat recipes/phyloacc/run_test.shLength of output: 1423
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the contents of build.sh cat recipes/phyloacc/build.shLength of output: 356
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (1)
1-35: Overall assessment: Good test coverage, needs improved error handling.The
run_test.shscript provides comprehensive testing for the PhyloAcc tool, covering dependency checks, interface testing, workflow execution, and post-processing. However, the script would benefit from more robust error handling throughout.Summary of suggestions:
- Enhance error handling for test data downloads.
- Add error checks for the dependency check, interface test, workflow test, and post-processing tests.
- Implement exit strategies when critical steps fail to prevent further execution with incomplete or failed prerequisites.
These improvements will make the test script more resilient and informative, helping to quickly identify and diagnose potential issues during the testing process.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- recipes/phyloacc/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
- recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/phyloacc/meta.yaml (2)
14-14: LGTM: Build number increment is appropriate.The build number has been correctly incremented from 1 to 2. This is the proper approach when making changes to a package configuration without altering its version number.
44-45: Approve addition of wget, but clarify removal of test commands.The addition of
wgetas a test requirement is appropriate if the new testing strategy involves downloading files. This aligns with the PR objective of enhancing the testing framework.However, I noticed that all previous test commands have been removed. Could you please clarify:
- Why were the previous test commands removed?
- How will the package functionality be verified without these commands?
- Is there a separate test script (e.g.,
run_test.sh) that will be usingwgetto download and run tests?Ensuring comprehensive testing is crucial for maintaining package reliability.
To verify the existence of a separate test script, please run:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the relocation of test commands to run_test.sh.
The addition of
wgetas a test requirement is appropriate and aligns with the new testing strategy implemented inrun_test.sh. All previous test commands have been successfully migrated, ensuring comprehensive testing remains intact.
- run_test.sh handles downloading test data and executing all necessary tests.
No further actions are required.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for the existence of run_test.sh in the recipe directory fd -t f "run_test.sh" recipes/phyloaccLength of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the contents of run_test.sh to verify the testing process cat recipes/phyloacc/run_test.shLength of output: 1423
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (1)
1-11: LGTM: Proper setup for shell script and test environment.The script begins with appropriate error handling options and creates an isolated test environment using a temporary directory. This is a good practice for ensuring clean and reproducible tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (1)
1-12: Improve trap command to prevent premature expansion.The script setup looks good overall, with proper error handling and temporary directory management. However, there's a minor improvement we can make to the trap command.
Consider updating the trap command to use single quotes:
-trap "rm -rf $TMP" EXIT +trap 'rm -rf $TMP' EXITThis change prevents the
$TMPvariable from being expanded when the trap is set, ensuring it always uses the current value of$TMPwhen the trap is executed.🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 10-10: Use single quotes, otherwise this expands now rather than when signalled.
(SC2064)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh
[warning] 10-10: Use single quotes, otherwise this expands now rather than when signalled.
(SC2064)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (5)
13-28: Well-implemented test data download section.The test data download section has been implemented robustly, addressing the concerns raised in previous reviews. It includes proper error handling and checks for successful downloads of all required files.
This implementation effectively resolves the issue raised in the past review comment regarding enhancing error handling for test data downloads.
30-35: Well-implemented dependency check test.The dependency check test has been implemented robustly, addressing the concerns raised in previous reviews. It includes proper error handling and exits the script if dependencies are not met.
This implementation effectively resolves the issue raised in the past review comment regarding adding error handling for the dependency check.
37-49: Well-implemented PhyloAcc interface and workflow tests.The PhyloAcc interface and workflow tests have been implemented robustly, addressing the concerns raised in previous reviews. Both tests include proper error handling and exit the script if the tests fail.
This implementation effectively resolves the issues raised in the past review comments regarding adding error handling for the interface and workflow tests.
51-60: Well-implemented post-processing test.The post-processing test has been implemented robustly, addressing the concerns raised in previous reviews. It includes proper error handling for both the help message display and the actual post-processing run.
This implementation effectively resolves the issue raised in the past review comment regarding adding error handling for post-processing tests.
1-60: Excellent implementation of the PhyloAcc test script.This test script for PhyloAcc is well-structured, comprehensive, and robust. It includes:
- Proper error handling and debugging options
- Efficient test data download with error checks
- Thorough testing of dependencies, interface, workflow, and post-processing
- Clear error messages and exit conditions for each test phase
The implementation effectively addresses all concerns raised in previous reviews, resulting in a high-quality test suite for the PhyloAcc tool.
Great job on implementing a comprehensive and reliable test script!
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 10-10: Use single quotes, otherwise this expands now rather than when signalled.
(SC2064)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (1)
10-10: Improve trap command portabilityConsider using single quotes for the trap command to ensure it expands when signaled rather than when declared. This improves portability across different shell environments.
Apply this change:
-trap "rm -rf $TMP" EXIT +trap 'rm -rf $TMP' EXIT🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 10-10: Use single quotes, otherwise this expands now rather than when signalled.
(SC2064)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh
[warning] 10-10: Use single quotes, otherwise this expands now rather than when signalled.
(SC2064)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/phyloacc/run_test.sh (5)
14-29: Excellent implementation of error handling for test data downloadsThe current implementation effectively addresses the concerns raised in the previous review. It includes proper error handling for failed downloads and ensures all files are downloaded successfully before proceeding with the tests.
31-36: Effective error handling for dependency checkThe current implementation successfully addresses the previous review's concerns. It includes proper error handling for the dependency check, ensuring the script exits if dependencies are not met.
38-50: Comprehensive error handling for interface and workflow testsThe current implementation effectively addresses the concerns raised in previous reviews. It includes proper error handling for both the PhyloAcc interface test and the Snakemake workflow test, ensuring the script exits if either test fails.
52-61: Robust error handling for post-processing testsThe current implementation successfully addresses the previous review's concerns. It includes comprehensive error handling for both the help message display and the actual post-processing run, ensuring all aspects of the post-processing script are functioning correctly.
1-61: Excellent implementation of the PhyloAcc test scriptThis script demonstrates a high-quality implementation of the PhyloAcc testing process. It includes:
- Proper error handling and debugging options
- Efficient test data download with error checks
- Comprehensive tests covering dependencies, interface, workflow, and post-processing
- Robust error handling for each test phase
The script addresses all concerns raised in previous reviews and follows shell scripting best practices. It provides a reliable and thorough testing process for the PhyloAcc tool.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[warning] 10-10: Use single quotes, otherwise this expands now rather than when signalled.
(SC2064)
|
@BiocondaBot please add label |
adding better tests to the build
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.