Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update nf-core to 3.0.1 #51272

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Update nf-core to 3.0.1 #51272

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Update nf-core: 3.0.03.0.1

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/nf-core (click to view/edit other files)
Summary Python package with helper tools for the nf-core community.
Home https://nf-co.re
Releases https://pypi.org/pypi/nf_core/json

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Oct 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the meta.yaml file for the nf-core package. The version number has been incremented from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1, indicating a new release. Additionally, the SHA256 checksum has been updated to reflect changes in the package content, changing from ab67b23840104f7f4125b13519ced9c8021494c03d2eba3f9af6bb3176588846 to 2ae884ac4d4ff200bd21a69a8c44d4b50e13c16a13474ed570e91955b335c2d7. Furthermore, the setuptools dependency has been added to the host requirements section. These modifications are standard for version updates and are likely associated with improvements or modifications made in the codebase of the nf-core package.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update nf-core to 3.0.0 #51249: This PR involves updating the nf-core package's version and SHA256 checksum in the meta.yaml file, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR for the same package.

Suggested reviewers

  • martin-g

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a527cc and 8853666.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml (1)

Line range hint 1-85: Consider reviewing dependencies and build specifications.

While the version update appears to be minor (3.0.0 to 3.0.1), it's worth considering the following:

  1. Dependencies: Review if any of the package dependencies need to be updated along with this version bump. The current dependencies list remains unchanged, which is likely correct for a minor update, but it's good to confirm.

  2. Build specifications: The 'noarch: python' specification and Python version requirement (>=3.8) remain unchanged, which is appropriate for a minor version update. However, it's good to verify that these specifications are still correct for version 3.0.1.

  3. Build number: The build number is set to 0, which is correct for a new version. No action needed here, but it's good to note.

These aspects look appropriate for a minor version update, but a quick verification could ensure everything is up-to-date.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69a61d4 and 7a527cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml (1)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 3.0.0 to 3.0.1, which aligns with the PR objective.

{% set version = "3.0.0" %}
{% set sha256 = "ab67b23840104f7f4125b13519ced9c8021494c03d2eba3f9af6bb3176588846" %}
{% set version = "3.0.1" %}
{% set sha256 = "2ae884ac4d4ff200bd21a69a8c44d4b50e13c16a13474ed570e91955b335c2d7" %}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

SHA256 checksum is not set correctly.

The sha256 field in recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml is currently set to a placeholder ('{{') instead of the actual checksum value. Please update it with the correct SHA256 checksum for the nf-core 3.0.1 package.

🔗 Analysis chain

SHA256 checksum update looks correct.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is expected for a new package version. However, it's crucial to verify that this checksum corresponds to the correct nf-core 3.0.1 package.

To verify the checksum, you can run the following script:

This script will download the package, calculate its checksum, and compare it with the one in the meta.yaml file.


To address the checksum verification issue, please run the following updated script:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SHA256 checksum of the nf-core 3.0.1 package

# Download the package
curl -L -o nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz https://pypi.io/packages/source/n/nf-core/nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz

# Calculate the SHA256 checksum
calculated_checksum=$(sha256sum nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz | awk '{print $1}')

# Compare with the checksum in the meta.yaml file
expected_checksum=$(grep 'sha256:' recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml | awk '{print $2}' | tr -d "'")

echo "Calculated checksum: $calculated_checksum"
echo "Expected checksum:   $expected_checksum"

if [ "$calculated_checksum" = "$expected_checksum" ]; then
    echo "Checksum verification successful!"
else
    echo "Checksum verification failed!"
fi

# Clean up
rm nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz

Length of output: 1131


Script:

# 
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SHA256 checksum of the nf-core 3.0.1 package using shasum

# Download the package
curl -L -o nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz https://pypi.io/packages/source/n/nf-core/nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz

# Calculate the SHA256 checksum using shasum
calculated_checksum=$(shasum -a 256 nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz | awk '{print $1}')

# Extract the expected checksum from the meta.yaml file
expected_checksum=$(grep 'sha256:' recipes/nf-core/meta.yaml | awk '{print $2}' | tr -d "'\"")

echo "Calculated checksum: $calculated_checksum"
echo "Expected checksum:   $expected_checksum"

if [ "$calculated_checksum" = "$expected_checksum" ]; then
    echo "Checksum verification successful!"
else
    echo "Checksum verification failed!"
fi

# Clean up
rm nf_core-3.0.1.tar.gz

Length of output: 1137

@mencian mencian merged commit 9264101 into master Oct 9, 2024
7 checks passed
@mencian mencian deleted the bump/nf_core branch October 9, 2024 16:13
This was referenced Oct 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants