Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pybiolib to 1.2.197 #51396

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

Update pybiolib to 1.2.197 #51396

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

BiocondaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Update pybiolib: 1.2.1881.2.197

install with bioconda Conda

Info Link or Description
Recipe recipes/pybiolib (click to view/edit other files)
Summary BioLib Python Client
Home https://github.com/biolib
Releases https://pypi.org/pypi/pybiolib/json
Recipe Maintainer(s) @acaprez

This pull request was automatically generated (see docs).

@BiocondaBot BiocondaBot added autobump Automatic Version Update new version labels Oct 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves modifications to the meta.yaml file for the pybiolib package. The primary changes include an increment in the version number from 1.2.188 to 1.2.197. Alongside this version update, the SHA256 checksum for the source tarball has been updated from 7c0ecd9edbbd94b5aaddf7d412d42d5e24de9d705bbf70422175e9bae6a35bae to cb1bd9b9ae34842a3b2eeb5b7cb1590a42fdd94ece8ec604e187436cfa352c66. No additional alterations to the structure or content of the meta.yaml file were made in this update.

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b25c3e and be84df4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • recipes/pybiolib/meta.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
recipes/pybiolib/meta.yaml (3)

2-2: Version update looks good.

The version has been correctly updated from 1.2.188 to 1.2.197, which is consistent with the PR objectives.


10-10: SHA256 checksum update looks correct.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is necessary for the new version of the package. However, it's important to verify that this checksum is correct for the new version of the pybiolib package.

To verify the checksum, you can run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SHA256 checksum of the pybiolib package

# Extract version and checksum from meta.yaml
version=$(grep 'version = ' recipes/pybiolib/meta.yaml | cut -d'"' -f2)
expected_checksum=$(grep 'sha256:' recipes/pybiolib/meta.yaml | awk '{print $2}')

# Download the package and calculate its checksum
url="https://pypi.io/packages/source/p/pybiolib/pybiolib-${version}.tar.gz"
actual_checksum=$(curl -sL "$url" | sha256sum | awk '{print $1}')

# Compare the checksums
if [ "$actual_checksum" = "$expected_checksum" ]; then
    echo "Checksum verification passed."
else
    echo "Checksum verification failed."
    echo "Expected: $expected_checksum"
    echo "Actual: $actual_checksum"
fi

Line range hint 1-62: Consider reviewing Python version constraint and runtime dependencies.

While the changes look good, it's worth considering the following:

  1. The Python version constraint (>=3.6,<3.13) might need regular updates. Consider if it needs adjustment for this new version.

  2. With a new version of pybiolib, some runtime dependencies might need updates. It's worth verifying if all the listed dependencies are still correct and if any new dependencies have been introduced.

To check for any changes in dependencies, you can run:

This script will show any differences in dependencies between the old and new versions.

✅ Verification successful

</run_scripts>


Runtime dependencies are consistent between versions 1.2.188 and 1.2.197. The Python version constraint (>=3.6,<3.13) remains appropriate.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare dependencies between old and new versions

old_version="1.2.188"
new_version="1.2.197"

# Function to extract dependencies
get_deps() {
    version=$1
    url="https://pypi.org/pypi/pybiolib/${version}/json"
    curl -s "$url" | jq -r '.info.requires_dist[]' | sort
}

echo "Old version ($old_version) dependencies:"
get_deps $old_version

echo -e "\nNew version ($new_version) dependencies:"
get_deps $new_version

echo -e "\nDiff:"
diff <(get_deps $old_version) <(get_deps $new_version)

Length of output: 1632


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare dependencies between old and new versions of pybiolib

set -e

old_version="1.2.188"
new_version="1.2.197"

# Function to extract dependencies
get_deps() {
    version=$1
    url="https://pypi.org/pypi/pybiolib/${version}/json"
    deps=$(curl -s "$url" | jq -r '.info.requires_dist // []' | sort)
    echo "$deps"
}

# Extract dependencies for old version
echo "Fetching dependencies for old version ($old_version)..."
old_deps=$(get_deps $old_version)

# Extract dependencies for new version
echo "Fetching dependencies for new version ($new_version)..."
new_deps=$(get_deps $new_version)

# Save dependencies to temporary files
echo "$old_deps" > old_deps.txt
echo "$new_deps" > new_deps.txt

# Compare dependencies
echo "Comparing dependencies..."
diff_output=$(diff old_deps.txt new_deps.txt)

# Display the results
if [ -z "$diff_output" ]; then
    echo "No differences found in dependencies between versions $old_version and $new_version."
else
    echo "Differences found in dependencies between versions $old_version and $new_version:"
    echo "$diff_output"
fi

# Clean up temporary files
rm old_deps.txt new_deps.txt

Length of output: 3292

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token

(syntax)


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@martin-g martin-g merged commit 904752e into master Oct 15, 2024
7 checks passed
@martin-g martin-g deleted the bump/pybiolib branch October 15, 2024 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
autobump Automatic Version Update new version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants