Update cosigt to version 0.1.3

[AndreaGuarracino]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request includes an update to the meta.yaml file for the cosigt package. The version number has been incremented from 0.1.2 to 0.1.3. The URL format for the source archive has been changed from tags/v{{ version }}.tar.gz to refs/tags/v{{ version }}.tar.gz, indicating a modification in how the source is referenced. Additionally, the SHA256 checksum for the source archive has been updated to a new value to ensure the integrity of the new version. There are no changes made to the build requirements, test commands, or other metadata sections within the file.

Possibly related PRs

• update cosigt to v0.1.2 #51391: This PR updates the meta.yaml file for the cosigt package from version 0.1.1 to 0.1.2, which is directly related to the main PR that updates it from 0.1.2 to 0.1.3, indicating a sequential versioning change.

Suggested labels

please review & merge

Suggested reviewers

• martin-g

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b3870a and 5202904.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• recipes/cosigt/meta.yaml (2 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (4)

recipes/cosigt/meta.yaml (4)

2-2: LGTM: Version update is correct.

The version has been correctly updated to 0.1.3, which aligns with the PR objective.

---

Line range hint 1-43: Summary: Version update changes look good overall.

The changes to update cosigt to version 0.1.3 are appropriate and consistent. The version number, source URL, and SHA256 checksum have been updated as expected. No changes were made to build requirements, test commands, or other metadata, which is suitable for a minor version update.

Please ensure to verify the new URL format and SHA256 checksum as suggested in the previous comments.

---

15-15: Verify the updated SHA256 checksum.

The SHA256 checksum has been updated, which is necessary for the new version. However, it's crucial to verify that this new value is correct for the updated source archive.

To verify the SHA256 checksum, you can run the following script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the SHA256 checksum for the new cosigt package version

# Test: Download the archive and calculate its SHA256
curl -L https://github.com/davidebolo1993/cosigt/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.3.tar.gz | sha256sum

# Expected result: 3a4efa472188c4820bb6d0c56225d9d6c7bb2120cdfb40b4c31892b36ec78652
# If the result is different, the SHA256 in the meta.yaml file might be incorrect

---

14-14: Verify the updated URL format.

The URL has been updated to include "refs/" in the path. While this change is consistent, please verify that this new URL format is correct and functional for accessing the source archive.

To verify the URL, you can run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

URL Update Verified Successfully.
The updated URL format has been verified and is accessible.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the updated URL format for the cosigt package

# Test: Check if the URL is accessible
curl -I https://github.com/davidebolo1993/cosigt/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.3.tar.gz

# Expected result: HTTP status code 200 (OK)
# If the result is different, the URL might be incorrect or inaccessible

Length of output: 4361

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the updated URL format for the cosigt package

# Test: Check if the URL is accessible and verify the HTTP status code
response=$(curl -I -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://github.com/davidebolo1993/cosigt/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.3.tar.gz)

echo "HTTP Status Code: $response"

# Expected result: 200
if [ "$response" -eq 200 ]; then
  echo "URL is accessible."
  exit 0
else
  echo "URL is not accessible. Received status code: $response"
  exit 1
fi

Length of output: 323

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the updated URL format for the cosigt package by following redirects

# Test: Check if the URL is accessible by following redirects and verify the final HTTP status code
response=$(curl -IL -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://github.com/davidebolo1993/cosigt/archive/refs/tags/v0.1.3.tar.gz)

echo "Final HTTP Status Code: $response"

# Expected result: 200
if [ "$response" -eq 200 ]; then
  echo "URL is accessible."
  exit 0
else
  echo "URL is not accessible. Received status code: $response"
  exit 1
fi

Length of output: 276

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[AndreaGuarracino]

@BiocondaBot please add label