-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[WIP] update to conda-build 3.10.9 (#312)
* build: rename --prelint to --lint, add --lint-only/--lint-exclude args * requirements: update to conda-build 3.10.9 * build: remove default value for --lint-exclude * requirements: require python >=3.6 * meta.get_section might return None (conda-build 3.10.9 compat) * silence most flake8 nagging * bioconductor: fix missing newline at EOF for post-link.sh * fix typo * use meta.get_value preferably * make flake8 shut up already * meta.get_value only works for path with depth 2 * lint: fix should_not_be_noarch for conda_build >3.10.3 * lint._has_compilers: also check for old compiler packages * lint._get_deps: fix sections being unset on default * docs: use only one job for debugging
- Loading branch information
1 parent
86fc487
commit 4f6b405
Showing
21 changed files
with
1,039 additions
and
922 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.