You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From a conversation with Marc Duby from genetics provider (Translator) a few action items were identified to help clarify the model to reflect "loss of function" -> phenotype/disease associations.
"genetic association" looks like an "association" but it is in the predicate hierarchy. Rename this to "genetically associated with", child of "associated with"
we have two associations: "gene to phenotypic feature association" and "gene to disease association" -- we think we can combine these using "disease or phenotypic feature" mixin as a range constraint.
we should add the appropriate qualifiers necessary to disambiguate the gene aspect and the phenotype/disease direction.
disambiguate which predicate to use with a qualitative vs a quantitative phenotype/disease (e.g. which predicate to use when you need to talk about the relationship between a gene and the likelihood of getting type 2 diabetes, vs. the affect that the loss of function of a gene can have on exacerbating or ameliorating a symptom/phenotype).
Genetics provider uses "BMI" as a "phenotype" instead of a measurement of obesity or some other disease. Some discussion of this would be helpful at a DM call.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From a conversation with Marc Duby from genetics provider (Translator) a few action items were identified to help clarify the model to reflect "loss of function" -> phenotype/disease associations.
Genetics provider uses "BMI" as a "phenotype" instead of a measurement of obesity or some other disease. Some discussion of this would be helpful at a DM call.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: