Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update view on activation with block at current chain height #2409

Merged

Conversation

ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2408.

@ripcurlx ripcurlx force-pushed the fix-make-proposal-initialization branch from 16a990a to 277084c Compare February 12, 2019 14:02
Copy link
Contributor

@ManfredKarrer ManfredKarrer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Beside the @Nullable/Optional issue utACK

return getBlockAtHeight(getChainHeight());
}

public Block getBlockAtHeight(int chainHeight) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add @nullable

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Or stick with Optional...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've already changed everything to Optional. Please see my force pushed state.

Copy link
Contributor

@ManfredKarrer ManfredKarrer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah saw you pushed that already....

@ManfredKarrer ManfredKarrer merged commit fc9119b into bisq-network:master Feb 12, 2019
@ripcurlx ripcurlx deleted the fix-make-proposal-initialization branch December 18, 2019 08:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants