-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For Cycle 7 #399
Comments
Could you separate the risq related issues in a separate compensation request? |
Because of the size of this PR I'm not sure if I'm able to ACK it and merge it in-time to be up for compensation. Please check before you finally submit your compensation request if everything is delivered. |
Could you please link the PRs/commits so it is easier to evaluate for all stakeholders. Thanks! |
I think it would be great to separate it out as @chimp1984 mentioned, as there was no consensus yet on the proposal bisq-network/proposals#125 |
Is the code implemented somewhere publicly available for review? |
These are the merged PRs. Hence I'm only billing for the first 2. Just referencing all for documentation.
Readme: https://github.com/bodymindarts/risq/#node-checker |
PROPOSAL TX: f5bd0fb074b47ff9d19e7bf76d5aa5aa72a6ee43336425b63a9f94bd6428c145 |
@ripcurlx I have removed the line item referring to the poc for now, since you haven't had the time to form an opinion. I look forward to reading your concerns so that I can address them as per https://docs.bisq.network/proposals.html. |
Please remove this not merged PR from your compensation request as it might confuse stakeholders when reviewing your request. |
Removed the PR section as I'm linking to the PRs in the line items |
Feel free to make a request at next cycle again for the delivered non-risq related work. I personally do not support the risq related work but would support your other request. But as you did not split it up I could not upvote the non-risq related contributions. |
@chimp1984 This makes no sense to me. The risq project is reliably serving > 1 mio requests per day for Bisq. The markets api is an important part of the supporting infrastructure of the Bisq network which was frequently crashing previously. Even if this isn't the best long-term solution its a pretty good stop-gap for the time being. In addition the seednode checker has detected offline seednodes multiple times in real-time where previously there was no visibility. Clearly this is creating significant value for bisq, and you supported it via @wiz request. According to you what criteria for compensation is not being fulfilled, and where is this criteria documented? |
As discussed privately I think/hope we have clearified most of the mis-understandings and different views. Feel free to adjust and make the request again in cycle 8. I will reconsider it again based on the result of our discussions and on the requested amount. In doubt you can split it up to multiple requests as well. |
Closed as rejected & posposed. |
Summary
This request includes contributions delivered in both Cycle 6 and Cycle 7 because I missed the deadline for Cycle 6.
BSQ requested: 16658BSQ total
Cycle 6: $4000 (@ 1 BSQ = 1 USD) => 4000BSQ
Cycle 7: $10000 (@ 1 BSQ = 0.79 USD) => 12658BSQ
Contributions delivered
Cycle 6
BSFormatter
class. [ 1500 USD]Make stateless BSFormatter functions static and remove dead code bisq#3239
Extract helper classes from BSFormatter bisq#3244
Cycle 7
Readme: https://github.com/bodymindarts/risq/#node-checker
Code: https://github.com/bodymindarts/risq/blob/master/src/checker.rs
Execution happens from @wiz' monitoring code which is closed source
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: