Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enabled CGO for Go Builds #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024
Merged

Enabled CGO for Go Builds #144

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

naveensrinivasan
Copy link
Member

@naveensrinivasan naveensrinivasan commented Nov 19, 2024

  • Enabled CGO for go builds as we are using sqlite

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the build process to enable CGO, allowing Go packages to call C code during compilation.
    • Adjusted the Dockerfile and Makefile accordingly without altering other functionalities.

- Enabled CGO for go builds as we are using sqlite

Signed-off-by: naveensrinivasan <172697+naveensrinivasan@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the Dockerfile and Makefile to enable CGO during the Go build process. In the Dockerfile, the environment variable setting has been updated from CGO=0 to CGO_ENABLED=1. Similarly, the Makefile has been altered to include CGO_ENABLED=1 in the build command for the build target. These adjustments allow Go packages to interface with C code, while the rest of the files remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
Dockerfile Changed environment variable from CGO=0 to CGO_ENABLED=1 to enable CGO for Go build process.
Makefile Updated build command for build target to CGO_ENABLED=1 go build -o bin/minefield main.go.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
We build our dreams in a clever way.
With CGO enabled, we leap and bound,
Calling C with joy, our skills unbound.
Hops of progress, we cheer and sing,
For every change, new joys they bring! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@naveensrinivasan has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a79071d and ccaf4e6.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Makefile (2)

Line range hint 7-8: Consider enabling CGO for test targets.

The test targets should match the build configuration to ensure consistent behavior.

Apply this diff to enable CGO for test targets:

test:
-	go test -v -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
+	CGO_ENABLED=1 go test -v -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

test-e2e: docker-up
-	e2e=true go test -v -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
+	e2e=true CGO_ENABLED=1 go test -v -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...

4-4: Important considerations for CGO-enabled builds.

Enabling CGO has several implications that should be considered:

  1. Cross-compilation becomes more complex
  2. Binary portability may be affected due to C library dependencies
  3. Build performance might be slightly impacted
  4. Security surface area increases due to C code integration

Consider documenting these implications in the project's build documentation.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a79071d and ccaf4e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • Makefile (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Dockerfile (2)

6-6: LGTM! Verify SQLite functionality in the container.

The CGO enablement is correct for SQLite support. However, let's verify that all required dependencies are available in the final image.

✅ Verification successful

CGO enablement is correctly implemented for SQLite support

The verification confirms that:

  • SQLite is properly integrated using GORM with both file-based and in-memory options
  • Required dependencies are present: gorm.io/driver/sqlite and github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3
  • Implementation includes proper error handling and configuration options
  • CGO is necessary as the codebase uses github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 which requires C bindings

The chainguard/glibc-dynamic base image will provide the necessary C runtime libraries for SQLite operation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for SQLite-related imports and verify glibc-dynamic image contents

# Check for SQLite package imports
echo "Checking for SQLite-related imports:"
rg -l 'sqlite'

# List available libraries in the final image (if documented)
echo "Checking available libraries in glibc-dynamic:"
rg -l 'glibc-dynamic' README.md

Length of output: 445


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the SQLite implementation details and dependencies

# Check SQLite import and usage in sql.go
echo "=== SQLite Implementation in sql.go ==="
rg -A 5 "sqlite" pkg/storages/sql.go

# Check server implementation
echo -e "\n=== SQLite Usage in Server ==="
rg -A 5 "sqlite" cmd/server/server.go

# Check go.mod for SQLite dependency
echo -e "\n=== SQLite Dependencies ==="
grep -A 3 "sqlite" go.mod

# Check if we're using CGO-specific features
echo -e "\n=== CGO/SQLite Related Code ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'import "database/sql"'

Length of output: 2559


Line range hint 1-13: Consider security implications of enabling CGO.

Enabling CGO increases the attack surface by allowing C code execution. Consider:

  1. Implementing security scanning for C dependencies
  2. Documenting the security implications in the project
  3. Ensuring the minimal set of required C libraries are available
Makefile (1)

4-4: LGTM! Verify SQLite dependency.

The CGO enablement is correct and necessary for SQLite support.

Let's verify the SQLite dependency in the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

SQLite dependency verified - CGO enablement is necessary

The codebase actively uses SQLite through:

  • GORM SQLite driver (gorm.io/driver/sqlite) for database operations
  • Both in-memory and file-based SQLite storage options
  • Dedicated SQL storage implementation in pkg/storages/sql.go
  • Server configuration supporting SQLite as a storage backend

The CGO_ENABLED=1 flag is required for the SQLite dependencies to work properly, particularly for github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 which is a CGO-dependent package.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify SQLite usage in the codebase
# Expected: Find imports of SQLite packages and database operations

# Check for SQLite related imports
echo "Checking for SQLite related imports..."
rg -l 'sqlite|modernc\.org/sqlite|mattn/go-sqlite3'

# Check for SQL operations specific to SQLite
echo "Checking for SQLite specific operations..."
rg -l '(?i)sqlite.*\.db|jdbc:sqlite|CREATE TABLE|SELECT.*FROM'

Length of output: 578


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual SQLite usage in the code files we found

# Check the SQL storage implementation
echo "=== SQLite implementation in pkg/storages/sql.go ==="
rg -A 5 'sqlite|modernc\.org/sqlite|mattn/go-sqlite3' pkg/storages/sql.go

# Check server implementation
echo -e "\n=== SQLite usage in server implementation ==="
rg -A 5 'sqlite|modernc\.org/sqlite|mattn/go-sqlite3' cmd/server/server.go

# Check imports in go.mod
echo -e "\n=== SQLite related dependencies in go.mod ==="
rg 'sqlite|modernc\.org/sqlite|mattn/go-sqlite3' go.mod

Length of output: 2344

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅


🚨 Try these New Features:

@naveensrinivasan
Copy link
Member Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@neilnaveen neilnaveen merged commit f8bc3c5 into main Nov 19, 2024
14 checks passed
@neilnaveen neilnaveen deleted the naveen/cgo branch November 19, 2024 16:18
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants