README: remove BIP 63 from the README index #1574
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In this commit, I propose we remove BIP 63 from the README index. The BIP number was assigned in [this PR](bitcoin#14), but no document was ever committed to the repo (?). Alternatively, based on BIP 2, we could just move it to the Rejected status, as the PR above was originally made more than 10 years ago: > BIPs should be changed from Draft or Proposed status, to Rejected > status, upon request by any person, if they have not made progress in > three years.
|
It's probably better to keep the table complete even if historically it shouldn't have been assigned a number |
|
bitcoin/bips is implicitly append-only by process
NAK
…On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:53 AM Olaoluwa Osuntokun < ***@***.***> wrote:
In this commit, I propose we remove BIP 63 from the README index. The BIP
number was assigned in this
PR <#14>, but no document was ever
committed to the repo (?).
Alternatively, based on BIP 2, we could just move it to the Rejected (or
Obsolete) status, as the PR above was originally made more than 10 years
ago:
BIPs should be changed from Draft or Proposed status, to Rejected
status, upon request by any person, if they have not made progress in
three years.
AFAICT, the concept was ultimately described in BIP 47 (Reusable Payment
Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets):
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0047.mediawiki
------------------------------
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
#1574
Commit Summary
- 5bdf09f
<5bdf09f>
README: remove BIP 63 from the README index
File Changes
(1 file <https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1574/files>)
- *M* README.mediawiki
<https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1574/files#diff-cd281ac965dc6343c4ebaa3baffc153b4841e22583a319e1cdd5114a12367fd5>
(7)
Patch Links:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1574.patch
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1574.diff
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1574>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMRS4W4YUFWNAC726O4ACZDY6WWIVAVCNFSM6AAAAABGTY45KSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGI2TONZQGU2DGNA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sure, that's reasonable. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this commit, I propose we remove BIP 63 from the README index. The BIP number was assigned in this
PR, but no document was ever committed to the repo (?).
Alternatively, based on BIP 2, we could just move it to the Rejected (or Obsolete) status, as the PR above was originally made more than 10 years ago:
AFAICT, the concept was ultimately described in BIP 47 (Reusable Payment Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets): https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0047.mediawiki