-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check results in the DB tests #857
Check results in the DB tests #857
Conversation
Just to make it clearer, the test failures were on your postresql database implementation, and not on our database implementations, correct? |
Clippy is complaining btw, otherwise it looks good to me |
Yes, that's correct, It hid the bugs that I had in my implementation. |
c8fab6b
to
5019d4c
Compare
Sorry to bother you again, can you rebase on master? Right now the CI is failing because of the hardware wallet job, and we have a fix on that in master. I sadly can't merge until the CI is green! |
No worries at all, I should have done it in the first place. Thanks :) |
Checksum test was giving a false positive due to ignoring the return value. Other tests were giving assertion fail later in the test, rather than an error on failed method call, thus making it more challenging to debug the issue. These have been discovered, when implementing PostgreSQL backend in a downstream fork.
5019d4c
to
a1a70a5
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK a1a70a5
Description
Checksum test was giving a false positive due to ignoring the return value.
Other tests were giving assertion fail later in the test, rather than an error on failed method call, thus making it more challenging to debug the issue.
These have been discovered, when implementing PostgreSQL backend in a downstream fork.
Checklists
All Submissions:
cargo fmt
andcargo clippy
before committingsqlite
andkey-value-db
tests successfully