Skip to content

Conversation

@Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Nov 10, 2024

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated action versions in various workflow files for improved performance and reliability:
      • pozil/auto-assign-issue updated to v2.0.0
      • actions/checkout updated to v4.2.2 in multiple workflows
      • xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher updated to v3.0.0
      • reviewdog/action-eslint updated to v1.32.0
      • davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action updated to v2.7.0

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to various GitHub Actions workflow files. Specifically, the versions of several actions have been upgraded across multiple workflow files, including actions/checkout, pozil/auto-assign-issue, xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher, reviewdog/action-eslint, and davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action. The overall structure and logic of the workflows remain unchanged, with no modifications to job definitions, environment variables, or permissions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue from v1.13.0 to v2.0.0.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2.
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4 to v4.2.2.
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2, xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher from v2 to v3.0.0, and reviewdog/action-eslint from v1.20.0 to v1.32.0.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2 and davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action from v2 to v2.7.0.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #110 for commit 2bd5d06 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1)

40-40: Remove trailing spaces.

There are trailing spaces at the end of line 40 that should be removed.

-      - name: Install compatible Nodejs version␣
+      - name: Install compatible Nodejs version
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and 2bd5d06.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (2)

14-14: LGTM! Safe version update for checkout action.

The update to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 is a patch version change that maintains compatibility while incorporating the latest fixes.


Line range hint 18-19: Consider checking for updates to the version updater action.

The workflow uses saadmk11/github-actions-version-updater@v0.8.1. Consider verifying if a newer version is available to ensure you're getting the latest features and improvements for the version updater itself.

✅ Verification successful

The workflow is already using the latest version of the GitHub Actions Version Updater

The workflow currently uses v0.8.1 of saadmk11/github-actions-version-updater, which is confirmed to be the latest release as of August 13, 2023. No version update is needed at this time.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the latest version of github-actions-version-updater
# Expected: Compare current v0.8.1 with latest release

gh release list --repo saadmk11/github-actions-version-updater --limit 1

Length of output: 124

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)

35-35: LGTM! Safe version update for checkout action.

The update to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 is a maintenance release with bug fixes while maintaining backward compatibility.


47-47: LGTM! Feature update for eslint action.

The update to reviewdog/action-eslint@v1.32.0 maintains backward compatibility while bringing new features and improvements.


43-43: Verify compatibility with markdownlint-problem-matcher v3.0.0.

This is a major version update (v2 → v3.0.0) which might include breaking changes.

✅ Verification successful

Let me check the GitHub repository for the action to understand the breaking changes.


The update to markdownlint-problem-matcher v3.0.0 is safe to use

The breaking changes in v3.0.0 only involve internal updates to the action's runtime (Node.js 16 to 20) and a minor dependency bump. These changes don't affect the functionality or configuration of the problem matcher itself. No configuration files need to be updated.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any markdownlint configuration files that might need updates
# for compatibility with the new version

echo "Searching for markdownlint configuration files..."
fd -e json -e yaml -e yml -e jsonc --glob '*markdownlint*'

Length of output: 169


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get information about the action from GitHub
gh api repos/xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher/releases/tags/v3.0.0 --jq '.body'

Length of output: 168

.github/workflows/test.yml (2)

34-36: LGTM: Safe update to actions/checkout@v4.2.2

The update to v4.2.2 is a minor version bump that maintains compatibility while incorporating the latest improvements and fixes.


54-57: LGTM: Appropriate update to vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.7.0

The update to v2.7.0 is well-protected with continue-on-error: true and maintains the same input parameters structure. The action remains non-blocking for the workflow.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 22, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2025

This pull request has been automatically closed due to inactivity. Please feel free to reopen if you would like to continue working on it.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants