Skip to content

Conversation

@Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Dec 8, 2024

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Chores
    • Updated action versions in various GitHub Actions workflows for improved performance and reliability:
      • Auto-assign issues action updated to version v2.0.1.
      • Checkout action updated to version v4.2.2 across multiple workflows.
      • Linting actions updated, including markdownlint-problem-matcher to v3.0.0 and eslint to v1.33.0.
      • Coverage report action updated to v2.8.0.

These updates enhance the efficiency and functionality of our automated workflows.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to several GitHub Actions workflow files, primarily focusing on upgrading action versions. The pozil/auto-assign-issue action has been updated from version v1.13.0 to v2.0.1, while the actions/checkout action has been consistently upgraded from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2 across multiple workflows. Other actions, such as xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher and reviewdog/action-eslint, have also seen version upgrades. The overall structure and logic of the workflows remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated uses: pozil/auto-assign-issue@v1.13.0 to uses: pozil/auto-assign-issue@v2.0.1
.github/workflows/deploy.yml Updated uses: actions/checkout@v4.1.1 to uses: actions/checkout@v4.2.2
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml Updated uses: actions/checkout@v4 to uses: actions/checkout@v4.2.2
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated uses: actions/checkout@v4.1.1 to uses: actions/checkout@v4.2.2, uses: xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher@v2 to uses: xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher@v3.0.0, and uses: reviewdog/action-eslint@v1.20.0 to uses: reviewdog/action-eslint@v1.33.0
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated uses: actions/checkout@v4.1.1 to uses: actions/checkout@v4.2.2 and uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2 to uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.8.0

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2024

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #114 for commit 52aa2fe by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1)

40-40: Remove trailing whitespace.

There is a trailing space at the end of line 40.

-      - name: Install compatible Nodejs version
+      - name: Install compatible Nodejs version
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

Line range hint 82-83: Consider moving npm audit earlier in the workflow.

While the npm signature verification is good, consider moving it immediately after npm ci to fail fast if there are security issues.

      - name: Install Deps
        id: deps
        run: |
          npm ci

+      - name: Verify the integrity of provenance attestations and registry signatures for installed dependencies
+        run: npm audit signatures
+
      - name: Ensure dependencies are compatible with the version of node
        run: npx --yes ls-engines

-      - name: Verify the integrity of provenance attestations and registry signatures for installed dependencies
-        run: npm audit signatures
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and 52aa2fe.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)

14-14: LGTM! Version update looks safe.

The update to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 is a minor version bump that maintains backward compatibility.

Let's verify the changelog for any breaking changes:

✅ Verification successful

Version update is safe to proceed

The changelog for actions/checkout@v4.2.2 shows only internal improvements:

  • Leveraging environment variables in URL helper
  • Expanded test coverage

These changes are non-breaking and don't affect the action's core functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the latest release notes for actions/checkout
gh api repos/actions/checkout/releases/tags/v4.2.2 --jq .body

Length of output: 390

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (2)

43-43: Verify compatibility with major version update.

The update from v2 to v3.0.0 of markdownlint-problem-matcher is a major version change that might include breaking changes.

✅ Verification successful

Update is safe to proceed

The major version update from v2 to v3.0.0 only includes internal changes:

  • Node runtime update from 16 to 20
  • Minor patch update to @actions/core dependency

These changes don't affect the functionality or interface of the action, making it safe to upgrade.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes for markdownlint-problem-matcher v3.0.0
gh api repos/xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher/releases/tags/v3.0.0 --jq .body

Length of output: 168


47-47: Verify ESLint action compatibility.

The significant version jump from v1.20.0 to v1.33.0 of reviewdog/action-eslint warrants verification of changes.

✅ Verification successful

Version update to action-eslint@v1.33.0 is safe to proceed

The version update from v1.20.0 to v1.33.0 only adds two new optional features (fail_level and deduplicate fail_on_error), which are not used in the current workflow configuration. The action remains backward compatible, and the current setup will continue to work as before.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes for reviewdog/action-eslint
gh api repos/reviewdog/action-eslint/releases/tags/v1.33.0 --jq .body

Length of output: 296


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check current ESLint configuration and usage
fd -e yml -e yaml -e json -e js -e cjs -e mjs -e json5 -e jsonc -e eslintrc . | xargs cat | grep -i eslint

# Check if fail_level or fail_on_error are used in the workflow
cat .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

Length of output: 13965

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

54-54: Verify coverage report action compatibility.

The update to davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.8.0 includes feature updates that should be verified.

✅ Verification successful

Coverage report action update is safe to use

The update to v2.8.0 only adds a new optional feature for customizing file coverage report paths via the file-coverage-root-path option. Since this is an opt-in feature and doesn't modify existing behavior, the update is backward compatible and safe to use.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch release notes for vitest-coverage-report-action
gh api repos/davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action/releases/tags/v2.8.0 --jq .body

Length of output: 495

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

55-58: LGTM! Version update aligns with security best practices.

The update to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 is appropriate and maintains security best practices by using a specific version and proper token authentication.

Let's verify the workflow's security configuration:

✅ Verification successful

Version update is consistent and security configuration is properly maintained

The verification confirms:

  • All workflows consistently use actions/checkout@v4.2.2, except for the disabled workflow
  • Appropriate permissions are set for the deployment workflow:
    • write access for actions, contents, issues, pull-requests, and id-token
  • RELEASE_TOKEN is properly used for authentication and git operations
  • Proper concurrency controls are in place
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify workflow permissions and token usage
# Check for appropriate permission scopes and token usage patterns
rg -A 5 "permissions:|RELEASE_TOKEN" .github/workflows/deploy.yml

# Check for other instances of checkout action to ensure consistency
rg "actions/checkout@" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 1274

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Nov 20, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2025

This pull request has been automatically closed due to inactivity. Please feel free to reopen if you would like to continue working on it.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants