Skip to content

Conversation

Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Jun 8, 2025

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated versions of several GitHub Actions used in workflows, including actions for code checkout, issue assignment, linting, and test coverage reporting. These updates improve workflow reliability and maintain up-to-date dependencies, with no changes to workflow logic or user-facing features.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Walkthrough

Several GitHub Actions workflow files were updated to use newer versions of their respective actions. These updates affect the versions of actions used for code checkout, issue assignment, linting, and test coverage reporting. No changes were made to the workflows' logic, parameters, or control flow.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue action from v1.13.0 to v2.2.0.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml
.github/workflows/test.yml
Updated actions/checkout action to v4.2.2 in all listed workflows.
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated DavidAnson/markdownlint-problem-matcher from v2 to v3.0.0; updated reviewdog/action-eslint from v1.20.0 to v1.33.2.
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action from v2 to v2.8.3.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Not applicable; the changes only update action versions without modifying workflow logic or control flow.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #140 for commit aac4e88 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1)

40-40: Remove trailing whitespace.

YAML lint flagged trailing spaces on this empty line. Cleaning this up will eliminate noise in diffs.

- (line 40 contains only spaces)
+ (line 40 should be blank)
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

54-54: Approve coverage-report action version bump; remove extra spacing.

  • Upgrades davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action to v2.8.3.
  • There's an extra space after the colon—standardize to a single space for consistency.
-        uses:  davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.8.3
+        uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.8.3
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and aac4e88.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/assign.yml (1)

9-9: Verify compatibility of major version bump for auto-assign-issue.

This upgrades pozil/auto-assign-issue from v1.x to v2.2.0. Please confirm that the v2.x release did not introduce breaking changes to inputs or behavior (e.g., renamed parameters or altered defaults).

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

55-55: Approve checkout action version bump.

Updating actions/checkout to v4.2.2 aligns with other workflows and pulls in the latest fixes and improvements.

.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)

14-14: Approve checkout action version pinning.

Switching from the generic v4 tag to the explicit v4.2.2 ensures reproducible runs across workflows.

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)

35-35: Approve checkout action version bump.

Consistent upgrade to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 across CI pipelines is in place.


43-43: Verify compatibility of major version bump for markdownlint matcher.

Upgrading xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher from v2 to v3.0.0 may include breaking changes to inputs or behavior. Please review the v3.0.0 release notes to ensure the matcher still picks up and reports issues correctly.


47-47: Approve ESLint action version bump.

Updating to reviewdog/action-eslint@v1.33.2 pulls in the latest bug fixes and features.

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

34-34: Approve checkout action version bump.

Consistent update to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 ensures all CI jobs use the same stable checkout behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant