Skip to content

Conversation

Jamie-BitFlight
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamie-BitFlight Jamie-BitFlight commented Jun 22, 2025

GitHub Actions Version Updates

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated multiple GitHub Actions workflows to use newer versions of actions for improved reliability and security.
    • Upgraded actions including checkout, auto-assign-issue, markdownlint-problem-matcher, reviewdog eslint, and vitest coverage report.
    • No changes to workflow logic or user-facing functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 22, 2025

Walkthrough

Several GitHub Actions workflow files were updated to reference newer versions of their respective third-party actions. These changes include version bumps for actions such as actions/checkout, pozil/auto-assign-issue, markdownlint-problem-matcher, reviewdog/eslint, and davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action. No workflow logic or control flow was modified.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/assign.yml Updated pozil/auto-assign-issue action from v1.13.0 to v2.2.0.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4.1.1 to v4.2.2.
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml Updated actions/checkout from v4 to v4.2.2.
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml Updated actions/checkout (v4.1.1 → v4.2.2), markdownlint-problem-matcher (v2 → v3.0.0), reviewdog/eslint (v1.20.0 → v1.33.2).
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated actions/checkout (v4.1.1 → v4.2.2), davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action (v2 → v2.8.3).

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagrams generated as the changes are limited to version updates of GitHub Actions and do not affect control flow or feature logic.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch gh-actions-update-1750554586

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Statements 72.11% 2092 / 2901
🔵 Functions 76.13% 67 / 88
🔵 Branches 82.96% 190 / 229
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #142 for commit 799a713 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

54-54: Fix extra whitespace before action reference.

The double space after uses: may break YAML parsing. Remove the extra space so it reads:

- uses:  davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.8.3
+ uses: davelosert/vitest-coverage-report-action@v2.8.3
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1)

40-40: Remove trailing whitespace.

YAMLlint flagged trailing spaces on this line. Please strip any end-of-line spaces to pass lint checks.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f822bc2 and 799a713.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/assign.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/deploy.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml

[error] 40-40: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/workflows/github_actions_version_updater.yml (1)

14-14: Pin actions/checkout to explicit patch version.

Updating from @v4 to @v4.2.2 improves reproducibility and aligns with the versions used in other workflows.

.github/workflows/assign.yml (1)

9-9: Upgrade auto-assign action to latest major release.

Bumping pozil/auto-assign-issue from v1.13.0 to v2.2.0 ensures you’re on the current stable API and benefit from recent fixes.

.github/workflows/deploy.yml (1)

55-55: Align checkout version with other workflows.

Switching actions/checkout to @v4.2.2 here matches the upgrade across CI pipelines and avoids version skew.

.github/workflows/test.yml (1)

34-34: Standardize checkout version for test runs.

Changing to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 keeps CI consistent and leverages the latest patch fixes.

.github/workflows/push_code_linting.yml (3)

35-35: Pin actions/checkout to a patch release.

Upgrading to actions/checkout@v4.2.2 ensures consistency with other workflows and leverages recent fixes.


43-43: Bump markdownlint matcher to v3.0.0.

Switching to xt0rted/markdownlint-problem-matcher@v3.0.0 brings in the latest rule updates and performance improvements.


47-47: Update ESLint reporter action.

Upgrading to reviewdog/action-eslint@v1.33.2 aligns with the most recent release and ensures compatibility with current ESLint versions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant