Fix review comments on BitNumberField component (#11932)

[msynk]

closes #11932

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Improved handling of number input field behavior based on immediate value update settings.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The HandleOnStringValueSet method in BitNumberField is made explicitly private and refactored to conditionally route value changes to either HandleOnStringValueInputAsync or HandleOnStringValueChangeAsync based on the Immediate property flag.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
BitNumberField method refactoring src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/NumberField/BitNumberField.razor.cs	HandleOnStringValueSet made explicitly private and converted to async; method body now branches based on Immediate flag to conditionally invoke different async handlers (HandleOnStringValueInputAsync vs HandleOnStringValueChangeAsync)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A hop, a skip, a method refined—
Private and async, with branching in mind!
When Immediate rings true, Input takes flight,
Otherwise Change leads the way right.
The NumberField hops on, so nimble and bright! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The PR title accurately and specifically describes the main change: fixing review comments on the BitNumberField component in response to issue #11932.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR addresses the objective from issue #11932 by fixing review comments on BitNumberField, including making HandleOnStringValueSet private and adjusting its logic flow based on Immediate property.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are scoped to BitNumberField component modifications directly addressing the linked issue #11932 review comments, with no unrelated changes detected.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between beb167a and 2f2dba1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/NumberField/BitNumberField.razor.cs

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: build Bit.BlazorUI

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/BlazorUI/Bit.BlazorUI/Components/Inputs/NumberField/BitNumberField.razor.cs (1)

374-386: LGTM! The conditional routing based on Immediate is correct.

The refactoring properly routes value changes to either immediate input handling or change handling based on the Immediate flag. The method is correctly bound in the Razor markup via @bind-value:set, and the async/await pattern is properly implemented. The @bind-value:event binding already handles switching between "oninput" and "onchange" events, so the conditional routing in this method correctly delegates to the appropriate handler.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}