Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a note about the secret type bug #135

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2018
Merged

Conversation

johnraz
Copy link
Contributor

@johnraz johnraz commented Dec 13, 2018

I just got bitten by the bug in #86 and #92 and lost quite a bit of time finding out what was happening.
This will hopefully help other people figure it out faster until the proper fix is released.

Copy link
Contributor

@anguslees anguslees left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for making this clearer for everyone..

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2018
135: Add a note about the secret type bug r=anguslees a=johnraz

I just got bitten by the bug in #86 and #92 and lost quite a bit of time finding out what was happening.
This will hopefully help other people figure it out faster until the proper fix is released.

Co-authored-by: Jonathan Liuti <liuti.john@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Dec 18, 2018

Build succeeded

@bors bors bot merged commit 0afe7f7 into bitnami-labs:master Dec 18, 2018
@victornoel
Copy link

@johnraz @anguslees quick question: the changelog from the releases page says that the per-key encryption was introduced in 0.7.0 and in 0.7.0, so shouldn't 0.6.0 enough to circumvent this bug? Or am I missing something?

Thanks :)

@johnraz johnraz deleted the patch-1 branch January 22, 2019 16:10
@johnraz
Copy link
Contributor Author

johnraz commented Jan 22, 2019

@victornoel I can’t remember if it tested 0.6.0 or not but I guess you could quickly do it and find out ;-)

@victornoel
Copy link

@johnraz @anguslees I can confirm that it works with 0.6.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants