Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix cli_tests websocket port binding issue #1178 #1187

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 28, 2018
Merged

Conversation

abitmore
Copy link
Member

@abitmore abitmore changed the title Set TCP bind port range for Travis-CI #1178 Fix cli_tests websocket port binding issue #1178 Jul 26, 2018
.travis.yml Outdated
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ script:
- sed -i '/tests/d' libraries/fc/CMakeLists.txt
- cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=--coverage -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=--coverage -DBoost_USE_STATIC_LIBS=OFF -DCMAKE_CXX_OUTPUT_EXTENSION_REPLACE=ON .
- 'which build-wrapper-linux-x86-64 && build-wrapper-linux-x86-64 --out-dir bw-output make -j 2 cli_wallet witness_node chain_test cli_test || make -j 2 cli_wallet witness_node chain_test cli_test'
- sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range="32768 60999"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove that line, it's not necessary.

@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ int get_available_port()
socklen_t len = sizeof(sin);
if (getsockname(socket_fd, (struct sockaddr *)&sin, &len) == -1)
return -1;
return sin.sin_port;
return ntohs(sin.sin_port);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While you're at it, please close socket_fd before returning.

@abitmore
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased.

@pmconrad
Copy link
Contributor

socket_fd remains open if either bind() or getsockname() fails, but I think in a unit test that's acceptable.

@pmconrad pmconrad merged commit 11d7faa into develop Jul 28, 2018
@abitmore abitmore deleted the abitmore-patch-3 branch July 30, 2018 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants