Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PM-6309] Fix for 'Show website icons' option not being respected #3033

Merged

Conversation

dinisvieira
Copy link

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature development
  • Tech debt (refactoring, code cleanup, dependency upgrades, etc)
  • Build/deploy pipeline (DevOps)
  • Other

Objective

'Show website icons' option is not being respected.

Code changes

The issue seems to be caused by the Icon_Success setting Icon to visible after loading it without taking into account the current WebsiteIcons setting.

  • BaseCipherViewCell.cs: Updated Icon_Success method to take into account the current WebsiteIcons setting.

Screenshots

Before you submit

  • Please check for formatting errors (dotnet format --verify-no-changes) (required)
  • Please add unit tests where it makes sense to do so (encouraged but not required)
  • If this change requires a documentation update - notify the documentation team
  • If this change has particular deployment requirements - notify the DevOps team

… is updated correctly based on website icons visibility choice
@dinisvieira dinisvieira requested a review from fedemkr February 25, 2024 19:36
@dinisvieira dinisvieira marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2024 19:37
@dinisvieira dinisvieira requested a review from a team as a code owner February 25, 2024 19:37
@dinisvieira dinisvieira merged commit 2f3cded into main Feb 26, 2024
14 checks passed
@dinisvieira dinisvieira deleted the feature/PM-6309-fix-for-website-icons-choice-not-respected branch February 26, 2024 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants