Remove non-generic wrapper for PasswordProtectedKeyEnvelope #488
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🎟️ Tracking
📔 Objective
The initial implementation assumed that the struct of of the PasswordProtectedKeyEnvelope in crypto had to be generic, because the key context is generic w.r.t. the keys used, and the keys are only then provided by core. Because uniffy / wasm-bindgen can't handle generics, I added a non-generic wrapper struct in core, leaving us with two different "PasswordProtectedKeyEnvelopes".
This understanding was not correct. You don't actually need to make the struct generic, having just two specific functions on the impl generic to the key id's suffices, allowing us to drop the "non generic wrapper" entirely, vastly simplifing our code here. The changes are mostly removing code and moving the uniffi mapping to the crypto crate.
⏰ Reminders before review
team
🦮 Reviewer guidelines
:+1:
) or similar for great changes:memo:
) or ℹ️ (:information_source:
) for notes or general info:question:
) for questions:thinking:
) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:
) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmedissue and could potentially benefit from discussion
:art:
) for suggestions / improvements:x:
) or:warning:
) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention:seedling:
) or ♻️ (:recycle:
) for future improvements or indications of technical debt:pick:
) for minor or nitpick changes