Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow arbitrary rolling sizes #766

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2020
Merged

Allow arbitrary rolling sizes #766

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2020

Conversation

nils-braun
Copy link
Collaborator

@nils-braun nils-braun commented Oct 17, 2020

Fixing #765

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 17, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #766 into main will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #766   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.89%   95.90%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        1729     1732    +3     
  Branches      331      332    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         1658     1661    +3     
  Misses         35       35           
  Partials       36       36           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
tsfresh/utilities/dataframe_functions.py 96.77% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4ee3f30...7e07a4e. Read the comment docs.

@nils-braun nils-braun changed the title Allow arbitrary rolling sizes, fixing #765 Allow arbitrary rolling sizes Oct 17, 2020
@nils-braun nils-braun merged commit cd5b209 into main Oct 18, 2020
@nils-braun nils-braun deleted the feature/arbitrary-rolls branch October 18, 2020 08:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants