update test workflow to python3.13 and poetry1.8.4 #175
Conversation
WalkthroughThe GitHub Actions workflow configuration has been updated to reflect changes in the Python and Poetry versions used for testing. The Python versions have been revised from five to four, specifically removing "3.8" and "3.11," while adding "3.13." The Poetry versions have also been updated, now including "1.7.1" and "1.8.4," replacing the previous versions. The overall workflow structure remains unchanged, maintaining the same steps for code checkout, Poetry installation, Python setup, library installation, linting, and testing. Additionally, the Dockerfile and related scripts have been modified to accommodate these version changes, and significant adjustments have been made to enhance the asynchronous capabilities of the server. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to bf095df in 17 seconds
More details
- Looked at
15lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/python-test-versions.yml:18
- Draft comment:
Python 3.13 is not officially released yet. Consider removing it from the test matrix until it is stable. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable:
The comment is relevant to the change made in the diff, which added Python 3.13 to the test matrix. The concern about using an unreleased Python version in the test matrix is valid, as it could lead to instability or unexpected issues. The comment is actionable, suggesting a specific change to remove Python 3.13 until it is stable.
I might be overestimating the importance of the comment. The author might have a reason for including Python 3.13, such as testing future compatibility, which the comment does not consider.
Even if the author has a reason for including Python 3.13, the comment highlights a potential risk that should be considered. It is better to address this risk explicitly.
The comment is valid and should be kept as it addresses a potential issue with including an unreleased Python version in the test matrix.
Workflow ID: wflow_MN2pZKN2hAA0Uv0I
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/python-test-versions.yml (1)
19-19: Approve Poetry version updates with a minor suggestionThe updates to the Poetry versions are well-considered:
- Removing the older 1.2.2 version is appropriate.
- Adding 1.7.1 and 1.8.4 ensures compatibility with recent Poetry releases.
- The range of versions (1.3.1 to 1.8.4) provides good coverage for compatibility testing.
Minor suggestion: Consider using the latest patch version for each minor version to ensure you're testing with the most up-to-date bugfixes. You can use the following script to fetch the latest Poetry versions:
#!/bin/bash # Fetch the latest Poetry versions curl -sSL https://api.github.com/repos/python-poetry/poetry/releases | grep '"tag_name":' | sed -E 's/.*"([^"]+)".*/\1/' | sort -rV | head -n 3This will help ensure you're always testing against the latest stable versions of Poetry.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/python-test-versions.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/python-test-versions.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-46: Address PR objectives: Updating test workflow to Python 13The PR successfully updates the test workflow to include Python 3.13, addressing the main objective. However, there are some concerns about the Python version selection that should be addressed before merging:
- The removal of Python 3.11 might limit coverage of currently used Python versions.
- The addition of Python 3.13 might be premature, as it's not yet officially released.
The Poetry version updates are well-considered and improve the testing coverage for different Poetry versions.
To ensure the PR fully meets its objectives and maintains broad compatibility, please review the earlier comments on Python and Poetry version selections. Consider running the provided scripts to verify the latest stable versions for both Python and Poetry.
18-18:⚠️ Potential issueReconsider Python version selection
The changes to the Python versions raise a few concerns:
- Removing Python 3.11 is unusual as it's a recent stable version widely used in production.
- Adding Python 3.13 is forward-looking but might be premature as it's not yet released and could be unstable.
- The gap between 3.10 and 3.12 (missing 3.11) might lead to compatibility issues.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Retain Python 3.11 in the test matrix to ensure compatibility with this widely-used version.
- Hold off on adding Python 3.13 until it's officially released and stable.
- Ensure your code is compatible with all versions between 3.9 and 3.12.
To verify the latest stable Python versions, you can run:
This will help ensure you're testing against the most relevant Python versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Skipped PR review on 740a464 because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please contact us and we'll fix it right away.
Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev
bluet
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pyproject.toml (1)
21-23: LGTM: Addition of new Python version classifiersThe addition of classifiers for Python 3.11, 3.12, and 3.13 is consistent with the PR objectives to update the test workflow to support newer Python versions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 287b041 in 16 seconds
More details
- Looked at
29lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/py-to-exe.yml:20
- Draft comment:
Python 3.13 is not yet officially supported by theactions/setup-pythonGitHub Action. Consider using a stable version like 3.12 until official support is available. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
2. pyproject.toml:34
- Draft comment:
Ensure all dependencies are compatible with Python 3.13 before updating the version constraint. Consider keeping the version constraint at 3.12 until compatibility is confirmed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful.
Workflow ID: wflow_6x69lOEFszxr0vbx
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Skipped PR review on c1ed3e5 because no changed files had a supported extension. If you think this was in error, please contact us and we'll fix it right away.
Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on a689d6d in 14 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/python-test-versions.yml:18
- Draft comment:
Python 3.11 is missing from the matrix. Consider adding it for consistency with the project configuration updates. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_jq8AElIyuYXOE3o3
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on f67a646 in 13 seconds
More details
- Looked at
39lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. Dockerfile:15
- Draft comment:
The commented-out section for installing dependencies (lines 11-13) is redundant and can be removed for clarity, as the same dependencies are installed later in the file. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%
The Dockerfile has a commented-out section for installing dependencies that is not needed since the same dependencies are installed later. This can be removed to clean up the file.
Workflow ID: wflow_gYN1KiAcRlHgXykv
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
Line range hint
11-11: Pin Poetry version to 1.8.4 as per PR objectives.The PR objectives mention updating to Poetry 1.8.4, but this is not reflected in the Dockerfile. Installing the latest version of Poetry without specifying a version can lead to inconsistencies between builds.
Consider pinning the Poetry version to 1.8.4:
-RUN \ - pip install -U poetry +RUN pip install poetry==1.8.4This change ensures consistency with the PR objectives and between different builds of the Docker image.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- .github/workflows/python-test-versions.yml (1 hunks)
- Dockerfile (2 hunks)
- docker-build.sh (1 hunks)
- proxybroker/api.py (1 hunks)
- proxybroker/server.py (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/python-test-versions.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Dockerfile (1)
1-1:⚠️ Potential issueConsider using a stable Python version for the base image.
While updating to newer Python versions is good, Python 3.13 is currently in alpha stage and not recommended for production use. Using an alpha version in a Dockerfile may lead to instability and compatibility issues.
Consider using a stable version of Python, such as 3.11 or 3.12, which are the latest stable releases:
-FROM python:3.13-slim AS base +FROM python:3.12-slim AS baseLet's verify the current stable Python versions:
docker-build.sh (2)
Line range hint
1-37: Script consistency maintained with version update.The updated VERSION variable (v2.0.0-alpha7) is correctly used throughout the script, including in Docker tagging commands and user prompts. The script's logic and structure remain unchanged, maintaining consistency with the version update.
3-3: Version update looks good, verify project-wide consistency.The version bump from
v2.0.0-alpha6tov2.0.0-alpha7is appropriate and follows semantic versioning for pre-release versions. This change aligns well with the updates to Python and Poetry versions mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure consistency, please verify that this version update is reflected in other relevant files across the project, such as
pyproject.toml,README.md, or any other documentation files. Run the following script to check for any inconsistencies:Please review the output and ensure all version references are updated consistently.
proxybroker/server.py (2)
425-425:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure the returned
datafrom_inject_headersis utilizedWith the addition of
return data, the_inject_headersmethod now returns the modified data. Please verify that all calls to_inject_headersare updated to use the returned value, ensuring that header injections take effect as intended.Run the following script to find all calls to
_inject_headersand check if the returned value is being used:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find calls to `_inject_headers` and verify if the returned data is used. # Search for calls to '_inject_headers(' and check if they are part of an assignment rg --type py --no-heading --line-number \ '^[^#]*\b_inject_headers\(' \ --replace '$0' \ | while read -r line; do # Check if the line contains an assignment if ! echo "$line" | grep -q '='; then echo "Potential issue at $line: Return value of '_inject_headers' may not be used." fi doneManually review any reported lines to ensure that the return value is properly utilized.
148-153: Ensure all invocations ofstartare awaitedBy changing
startto an asynchronous method (async def start(self):), any code that calls this method must now useawait. Please verify that all calls tostarthave been updated toawait self.start()to preventRuntimeWarning: coroutine 'start' was never awaitedand ensure proper asynchronous execution.Run the following script to identify places where
startis called withoutawait:Also applies to: 155-155
✅ Verification successful
All invocations of
startare properly awaitedNo instances of
startbeing called withoutawaitwere found. The asynchronous execution is correctly handled across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find calls to `start` that may need to be updated to use `await` # Search for lines calling 'start(' that are not commented out and do not contain 'await' rg --type py '^[^#]*\bstart\(' --invert-match 'await\s+\bstart\('Length of output: 685
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find calls to `start` that may need to be updated to use `await` # Search for lines calling 'start(' that are not commented out and do not contain 'await' rg --type py '^[^#]*\bstart\(' | grep -Pv 'await\s+\bstart\('Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find calls to `start` that may need to be updated to use `await` # Search for lines calling 'start(' that are not commented out and do not contain 'await' rg --type py '\bstart\(' | grep -Pv 'await\s+\bstart\('Length of output: 164
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on af7c28b in 22 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
0drafted comments based on config settings.
Workflow ID: wflow_ONO13d2pXKnDR76b
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on aa0f8e9 in 12 seconds
More details
- Looked at
14lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. Dockerfile:28
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a step to install the project dependencies in the final image to ensure they are available at runtime. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_AvXdjiRytDYyXw0j
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
23-28: Approved with suggestion: Optimized RUN commandThe new RUN command effectively combines multiple steps, including cleanup, which addresses previous review comments and optimizes the Dockerfile. Great job on implementing these improvements!
Consider removing the
--no-devflag from thepoetry installcommand in the builder stage:- poetry install --no-interaction --no-ansi --no-dev && \ + poetry install --no-interaction --no-ansi && \This change ensures that development dependencies are available in the builder stage, which can be useful for running tests or other development tasks. You can exclude dev dependencies in a later stage if needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- Dockerfile (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Dockerfile (3)
18-18: Approved: Build stage label capitalizedThe capitalization of "AS" in the build stage label is a minor style improvement that aligns with Docker best practices.
Line range hint
1-28: Overall assessment: Dockerfile improvements are well-implementedThe changes to the Dockerfile align well with the PR objectives and address previous review comments effectively. The update to Python 3.13, optimization of RUN commands, and inclusion of cleanup steps all contribute to a more efficient and up-to-date Docker image. The minor suggestion regarding the
--no-devflag is the only point for consideration. Great work on these improvements!
1-1: Approved: Base image updated to Python 3.13The update to
python:3.13-slimaligns with the PR objective and provides access to the latest Python features and improvements.Please ensure all project dependencies are compatible with Python 3.13. You can verify this by running:
Important
Update Python to 3.13 and Poetry to 1.8.4 in workflows, Dockerfile, and project configuration, and introduce async server handling.
3.13and Poetry to1.8.4inpy-to-exe.yml.3.9,3.10,3.12,3.13and Poetry versions to1.7.1,1.8.4inpython-test-versions.yml.python:3.13-sliminDockerfile.v2.0.0-alpha7indocker-build.sh.^3.9inpyproject.toml.3.11,3.12,3.13to classifiers inpyproject.toml.serve()inapi.pyto useasyncserver start.start()inserver.pyto beasync.This description was created by
for aa0f8e9. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit