Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: fastnode support by trigger el-sync when needed #201

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

krish-nr
Copy link
Contributor

Description

In the current synchronization mode, fastnode-type nodes fail to synchronize when a gap needs to be filled because elsync is not enabled by default. We have added a mechanism to trigger elsync in such scenarios.

Rationale

Added two configurations:

--fastnode=true (default is false)
--el-trigger.gap=86400 (default value)
These two configurations are not dependent on each other.
When fastnode is set to true, elsync will be automatically triggered every time fastnode starts.
In certain scenarios, where the block height is significantly lagging, we still want to enable elsync. In such cases, we can set el-trigger.gap to specify the lagging block height that triggers elsync. This configuration only takes effect when --syncmode=execution-layer is set.

Example

N/A

Changes

Notable changes:

  • add 2 configs for el-sync optimization

@krish-nr krish-nr requested a review from redhdx May 24, 2024 09:13
@krish-nr krish-nr force-pushed the fastnode_support branch from 4fb86ec to b1c179e Compare June 6, 2024 04:27
@krish-nr krish-nr force-pushed the fastnode_support branch from b1c179e to 93a8ab3 Compare June 6, 2024 04:31
Copy link
Contributor

@redhdx redhdx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@owen-reorg owen-reorg merged commit b8d810a into bnb-chain:develop Jun 7, 2024
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants