-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: action to build custom Diamond database #103
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #103 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 97.74% 97.70% -0.04%
==========================================
Files 35 39 +4
Lines 2172 2267 +95
==========================================
+ Hits 2123 2215 +92
- Misses 49 52 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @Sann5, here's the first round of code comments. I have not tried running it out yet though - did you get a chance to see what's up with those taxonomy annotations? Do they really get added to the final output?
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️
|
|
New files for dbs New files for dbs in eggnog. Further adjustments.
Hey @Sann5, thanks for testing out the different options for including the taxonomy annotations. I'm only wondering now, what that really brings if you cannot see any difference when running the |
Also, when you look carefully at the output of both commands you will notice that in neither of those the tax IDs were mapped to your query sequences, which may explain why the
case 2:
What do your database headers look like in both scenarios? |
Co-authored-by: Michal Ziemski <mziemski@ethz.ch>
Hey @misialq :). So... I tried with sequences whose accession IDs are in fact in the database as we discussed.
|
Hey @Sann5, thanks for investigating! Finally, that makes sense now 😅 What I would suggest is that we just carry on with this PR and in parallel maybe you could test the annotation (as you suggested) when you're working on the tutorials to see what the difference is (if any). How does that sound? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good to go! 🚀
Sounds good @misialq, I will do so :) Again I cannot merge this one because the test doesn't pass 😅. Can you do it? |
Closes #102 (ENH: action to build custom Diamond database)
Run it locally
Assuming you have a working environment, run the following.
cd wherever_you_want_to_download_the_data_to