Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve conda recipe #18

Closed
loic-couderc opened this issue Mar 24, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Improve conda recipe #18

loic-couderc opened this issue Mar 24, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@loic-couderc
Copy link
Member

For now (see #5) , the process of building a conda package uses the default build.py script. It will be preferable to write a specific build script:
Instead of using submodules, use conda requirements.

To enable this, the code have to be slightly modified to search binaries from matam dir first then from the path.

@ppericard ppericard added this to the Backlog milestone Jun 6, 2017
@loic-couderc
Copy link
Member Author

I wrote a conda recipe which do not compile the dependencies but instead uses conda requirements.
It works perfectly well, except for SGA on centos 6 (glibc error).
I think it will be preferable to wait for the support of a new gcc compiler (i.e. gcc >= 4.9.0) before carry on.

@ppericard
Copy link
Member

This issue is too generic. Closing it for now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants