Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport collision monitor "limit" model #22

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2023
Merged

Backport collision monitor "limit" model #22

merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2023

Conversation

kaichie
Copy link

@kaichie kaichie commented May 30, 2023

Backport ros-planning#3519 feature only.

* add LIMIT polygon type

* fix unit tests

* Fix MIN_POINT doesn't exist

* Fix Action type enum

* FIX velocity used

* FIX unit test point distance

increase point distance to not be in limit field

* Update collision_monitor_node_test.cpp

* fix status name not updated

* [MOD] only single linear limit

* Apply review comments

* Update nav2_collision_monitor/include/nav2_collision_monitor/types.hpp

---------

Co-authored-by: Steve Macenski <stevenmacenski@gmail.com>
@kaichie kaichie requested review from a team, jayyoung, richardw347, scheunemann and doisyg and removed request for a team May 30, 2023 14:00
Copy link

@scheunemann scheunemann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @kaichie looks good to me. From the looks it shouldn't change anything what is currently implemented with us. However, did you run this on a robot or simulation?

Copy link

@scheunemann scheunemann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kaichie and I tested it on our real robot, all good 👍

Thank you for bringing it in @kaichie

@kaichie
Copy link
Author

kaichie commented May 30, 2023

Thanks for checking!

@kaichie kaichie merged commit cb66ec6 into bau May 30, 2023
@kaichie kaichie deleted the AUTO-876 branch May 30, 2023 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants