Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename uses of enterprise_token to enterprise_id #79

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2015
Merged

Conversation

jmoldow
Copy link
Contributor

@jmoldow jmoldow commented Oct 3, 2015

This parameter is referred to as enterprise_id in the Box Developer documentation. Also, the noun "token" is already used to refer to the data returned at the end of the auth process. So rename this to reduce confusion.

This is a backwards compatible change, because the method parameter name was already correct. This is only a change to private attributes, test code, and documentation.

Also add a temporary pip version exclusion on the latest version of pytest, which is broken on Python 2. See pytest-dev/pytest#1085 and pytest-dev/pytest#1035.

@boxcla
Copy link

boxcla commented Oct 3, 2015

Verified that @jmoldow has signed the CLA. Thanks for the pull request!

This parameter is referred to as enterprise_id in the Box
Developer documentation. Also, the noun "token" is already used
to refer to the data returned at the end of the auth process. So
rename this to reduce confusion.

This is a backwards compatible change, because the method
parameter name was already correct. This is only a change to
private attributes, test code, and documentation.

Also add a temporary pip version exclusion on the latest version
of pytest, which is broken on Python 2.
@potrebic
Copy link
Contributor

potrebic commented Oct 3, 2015

Looks good to me +2

potrebic added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2015
Rename uses of enterprise_token to enterprise_id
@potrebic potrebic merged commit 51a8a47 into master Oct 3, 2015
@jmoldow jmoldow deleted the enterprise_id branch May 25, 2016 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants