-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduce iterable_values() #33
Conversation
d423205
to
de8ca5d
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.0.x-dev #33 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
===========================================
Files 3 4 +1
Lines 39 48 +9
===========================================
+ Hits 39 48 +9
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
de8ca5d
to
1a64b1d
Compare
Excellent, I was thinking about it :-) Would you mind instead:
(Similarly as what we did with filter / map). Thank you! 🙏 |
makes sense 🆗 |
4ae1125
to
65ed431
Compare
65ed431
to
cfceadb
Compare
cfceadb
to
ce8b421
Compare
ce8b421
to
f29a138
Compare
Thank you @simPod ! 🙏 |
I was thinking an option to lose all keys might be handy. Eg. when you want to create array from iterable using your way (not using
iterable_to_array()
.