Added unverified bots default intent.

[AA1999]

Same as i_default_intents but also has i_message_content intent.

[Commandserver]

Does unverified bots have message content intent enabled by default? 🤔

[braindigitalis]

no, this only applies to unverified bots added before the change not new ones created today

the message content is still a privileged intent and should not be made default by dpp

[AA1999]

Any unverified bot that is below 100 server should have no problems using message intents tho, right?
Discord made it clear it's only a thing for verified bots anyways (or the bots at 100 servers)

[braindigitalis]

Any unverified bot that is below 100 server should have no problems using message intents tho, right? Discord made it clear it's only a thing for verified bots anyways (or the bots at 100 servers)

yes but it is still a privileged intent and you still have to go into developer page and turn it on... we would be introducing issues later when the bot grows and they then require approval to use the intent...

[AA1999]

It is called unverified bots intent for a reason

[braindigitalis]

still shouldn't be defaulted imho, it becomes something else later and people will get used to having it enabled

[braindigitalis]

hmm this actually looks different to what I saw before.... I'll merge it later

[raxyte]

still shouldn't be defaulted imho, it becomes something else later and people will get used to having it enabled

Agreed with this statement here.

[raxyte]

It's really unnecessary and in-fact over-thought imo.

[AA1999]

It's not replacing the default_intents
It's just a handy alternative for people making bots that are private/never gonna reach 100 servers

[raxyte]

It's not replacing the default_intents It's just a handy alternative for people making bots that are private/never gonna reach 100 servers

I'm aware it's not replacing that, but I still feel the same. Rest is up to @braindigitalis.

[Commandserver]

It's really unnecessary and in-fact over-thought imo.

I agree tbh. If people need the message content intent, they should just pass that besides the default intents. It also makes it not really easier to use

[AA1999]

We already have a all intents that people might wrongly get used to.
We could maybe rename it better but I feel like it's not really a bad addition

[Commandserver]

We already have a all intents that people might wrongly get used to.
We could maybe rename it better but I feel like it's not really a bad addition

I would suggest i_defaults_and_message_intents

[es183923]

That is literally just as verbose as i_default_intents | i_message_content

[AA1999]

Idk just feels like having aliases is fine

We already have a all intents that people might wrongly get used to.
We could maybe rename it better but I feel like it's not really a bad addition

I would suggest i_defaults_and_message_intents

Seems fine to me, we'll let brain decide

[AA1999]

Maybe i_private_bots_default_intents?