Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for development signing #1247

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2019
Merged

add support for development signing #1247

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2019

Conversation

tmancey
Copy link
Collaborator

@tmancey tmancey commented Jan 8, 2019

add support for development signing
Copy link
Contributor

@srirambv srirambv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uplift to 0.59.x approved after deliberating with @bbondy and @kjozwiak. Please ensure that the associated issue(s) are also moved into the correct milestone.

}
} else {
# an empty dummy file just to simplify things
provisioning_profile = "//brave/build/mac/dummy.provisionprofile"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This logic is changing; is an empty dummy.provisionprofile OK for non-official builds? (have you tested this code-path?)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this logic isn't changing, signing never worked for non-official builds. This is in fact the only code path I have tested because I can't test the dev/beta signing

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for dev signing we only pass a provision profile to simplify things with the number of arguments. It isn't actually used in the signing script when --development (below) is passed

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
}

#if !defined(OFFICIAL_BUILD)
return "com.brave.Browser.development";
return "com.brave.Browser";
Copy link
Member

@bsclifton bsclifton Jan 8, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did this need to change? Was it defaulting non-official builds to the dev ID?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually this shouldn't be needed. I think it's just leftover from when I couldn't get it to work when everything was set to com.brave.Browser.development. I'll check now

add support for development signing
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants