This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 11, 2019. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 973
cannot sort by publisher verification status in about:preferences#payments #10752
Labels
0.21.x
issue first seen in 0.21.x
bug/good-first-bug
feature/rewards
QA/checked-Linux
QA/checked-macOS
QA/checked-Win64
QA/test-plan-specified
release-notes/include
Milestone
Comments
10 tasks
Pretty sure this issue should be closed now, no? |
It will be closed when we merge #12750, but we need to wait until correct milestone is up before merging |
alexwykoff
modified the milestones:
0.20.x Hotfix 3 (Ledger improvments),
0.21.x (Beta Channel)
Feb 6, 2018
NejcZdovc
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 7, 2018
…sort Fixes Issue #10752, allows for sorting by publisher verification
NejcZdovc
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 7, 2018
…sort Fixes Issue #10752, allows for sorting by publisher verification
NejcZdovc
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 7, 2018
…sort Fixes Issue #10752, allows for sorting by publisher verification
NejcZdovc
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 24, 2018
…sort Fixes Issue #10752, allows for sorting by publisher verification
Removed QA/checked labels due to changes in milestones. Please recheck with 0.21.15 and higher. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
0.21.x
issue first seen in 0.21.x
bug/good-first-bug
feature/rewards
QA/checked-Linux
QA/checked-macOS
QA/checked-Win64
QA/test-plan-specified
release-notes/include
Test Plan
verified
columnsite
columninclude
columnviews
columntime spent
column%
columnactions
columnOriginal Bug
Did you search for similar issues before submitting this one?
yes
Platform (Win7, 8, 10? macOS? Linux distro?):
macos
Brave Version (revision SHA):
0.18.23
Steps to reproduce:
Actual result:
the table is not sorted
the table should be sorted
Is this an issue in the currently released version?
yes
Can this issue be consistently reproduced?
yes
Extra QA steps:
1.
2.
3.
Screenshot if needed:
Any related issues:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: