Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating Currents docs #7617

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ian-absher
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request/Issue Resolution

Description of Change:

This updates the Currents docs to:

  • Fix an issue with the mParticle example event
  • Add enriched fields that were missing
  • Alphabetize the fields in the events

Closes #ISSUE_NUMBER_HERE

Is this change associated with a Braze feature/product release?

  • Yes (Insert Feature Release Date Here)
  • No

✔️ Pull Request Checklist
  • Check that you haven't removed any images (replacing an image with an updated one of the same name is fine), as this breaks the French site
  • Check that all links work.
  • Ensure you have completed our Contributors License Agreement.
  • Tag @josh-mccrowell-braze and @internetisaiah as a reviewer when your work is done and ready to be reviewed for merge. Are you an internal product manager? Reference the internal reviewing chart to tag the appropriate reviewer.
  • If the documentation involves a 1) paid SKU, 2) a third party, 3) SMS, 4) AI, or 5) privacy, ensure that Ana Teresa Serafino on the Legal team has signed off.
  • Tag others as reviewers as necessary.
  • If you have modified any links, be sure to add redirects to assets > js > broken_redirect_list.js
⭐ Helpful Wiki Shortcuts
❗ ATTN: For PR Reviewers
  • Read our Reviewing a PR page for more on our reviewing suggestions.
  • Read our Previewing Documentation page to see how to check the deployment.
    • Preview all changes in the linked Vercel environment by clicking the preview link in the vercel-bot comment in your PR.
❗ ATTN: Internal Reviewing Chart
Work at Braze and not sure who to tag for review?
Before tagging @josh-mccrowell-braze or @internetisaiah for a general review, reference the following chart to see if a specific product vertical/reviewer applies to your pull request.

Reviewer Product Vertical
@josh-mccrowell-braze Monolith Deployments
Quality Infrastructure
Platform Infrastructure
Datalake
SDKs
Currents
@internetisaiah Developer Guide
Technology partners
Channels
@bre-fitzgerald Intelligence
In-App Messages
Channels
Frontend Infrastructure & Experience (FIX)
@lydia-xie Ingestion
Core Objects
Core Messaging
Messaging Experience
Message Components
Email (Composition and Infrastructure) (tag @rachel-feinberg for Liquid use cases)
@rachel-feinberg Customer Lifecycle, Identity and Permissions
SMS
User Targeting
Reporting

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2024

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please fill out the information here. To re-call the cla-bot, comment @cla-bot check.

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2024

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please fill out the information here. To re-call the cla-bot, comment @cla-bot check.

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2024

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please fill out the information here. To re-call the cla-bot, comment @cla-bot check.

@internetisaiah
Copy link
Contributor

@ian-absher , left one comment for you. also, you will need to sign the CLA agreement before continuing! If you get stuck, just let me know and I'm happy to help out 👍🏽

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2024

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please fill out the information here. To re-call the cla-bot, comment @cla-bot check.

Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2024

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please fill out the information here. To re-call the cla-bot, comment @cla-bot check.

Copy link
Contributor

@internetisaiah internetisaiah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Just waiting on CLA to be signed 👍🏽

@josh-mccrowell-braze
Copy link
Collaborator

@cla-bot check

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Jul 2, 2024
Copy link

cla-bot bot commented Jul 2, 2024

The cla-bot has been summoned, and re-checked this pull request!

@josh-mccrowell-braze josh-mccrowell-braze merged commit 54112f8 into develop Jul 2, 2024
3 checks passed
@josh-mccrowell-braze josh-mccrowell-braze deleted the DI-6442-enriched-fields branch July 2, 2024 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants