Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make less-safe work on espidf #1944

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

coder0xff
Copy link
Contributor

The espidf platforms don't have an (always working) hardware RNG. #1787 plans to work around this by implementing a software CSPRNG to support such platforms. In the meantime, however, this PR enables the "less-safe-getrandom-custom-or-rdrand" feature to be used with espidf.

@briansmith
Copy link
Owner

I think we should change this to have its own feature, less-safe-getrandom-espidf. We should also add documentation for the feature about why it is "less safe": based on the espidf documentation, it isn't clear that the espidf PRNG is strong enough to consider a CSPRNG.

@coder0xff
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think we should change this to have its own feature, less-safe-getrandom-espidf. We should also add documentation for the feature about why it is "less safe": based on the espidf documentation, it isn't clear that the espidf PRNG is strong enough to consider a CSPRNG.

I've updated the PR with your corrections

@briansmith
Copy link
Owner

Great, thanks! How can I install the tools needed to cross-compile for this target so I can test that this at least builds?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.30%. Comparing base (ee1e217) to head (f9840d6).

❗ Current head f9840d6 differs from pull request most recent head 67a2379. Consider uploading reports for the commit 67a2379 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1944      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.32%   96.30%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         137      135       -2     
  Lines       20704    20663      -41     
  Branches      226      226              
==========================================
- Hits        19943    19899      -44     
- Misses        728      730       +2     
- Partials       33       34       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

src/lib.rs Outdated
@@ -32,6 +32,14 @@
//! </a> and <a href="https://docs.rs/getrandom/0.2.10/getrandom/#rdrand-on-x86">
//! RDRAND on x86
//! </a> for additional details.
//! <tr><td><code>less-safe-getrandom-espidf</code>
//! <td>Treat getrandom as a secure random number generator (see
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The rustfmt job is complaining about this line (trailing whitespace?).

Copy link
Owner

@briansmith briansmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this. This LGTM as soon as the CI passes. See the comment above about rustfmt. I would also appreciate your help in getting this target building (mk/cargo.sh test --norun, at least) in GitHub Actions, if you can.

@briansmith
Copy link
Owner

@coder0xff Could you please rebase this, cargo fmt to fix the CI error, and then squash the commits into one? Then I can merge this. Thanks!

@coder0xff
Copy link
Contributor Author

coder0xff commented Feb 29, 2024 via email

@coder0xff
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coder0xff Could you please rebase this, cargo fmt to fix the CI error, and then squash the commits into one? Then I can merge this. Thanks!

Rebased and formatted. Does GitHub have an option to squash on merge? I couldn't find it.

Great, thanks! How can I install the tools needed to cross-compile for this target so I can test that this at least builds?

I used the guide at https://docs.esp-rs.org/book/installation/riscv-and-xtensa.html

I would also appreciate your help in getting this target building (mk/cargo.sh test --norun, at least) in GitHub Actions, if you can.

I don't have any experience with GitHub actions. I do have a simple test project that I've been using to build for the esp32s3 target.

Directory Structure

.
├── build.rs
├── .cargo
│   └── config.toml
├── Cargo.toml
├── .gitignore
├── rust-toolchain.toml
├── sdkconfig.defaults
└── src
    └── main.rs

2 directories, 7 files

Contents of: build.rs

fn main() {
    embuild::espidf::sysenv::output();
}

Contents of: .cargo/config.toml

[build]
target = "xtensa-esp32s3-espidf"

[target.xtensa-esp32s3-espidf]
linker = "ldproxy"
# runner = "espflash --monitor" # Select this runner for espflash v1.x.x
runner = "espflash flash --monitor" # Select this runner for espflash v2.x.x
rustflags = [ "--cfg",  "espidf_time64"] # Extending time_t for ESP IDF 5: https://github.com/esp-rs/rust/issues/110

[unstable]
build-std = ["std", "panic_abort"]

[env]
MCU="esp32s3"
# Note: this variable is not used by the pio builder (`cargo build --features pio`)
ESP_IDF_VERSION = "v5.1.2"

Contents of: Cargo.toml

[package]
name = "esp32s3-ring-sandbox"
version = "0.1.0"
authors = ["coder0xff <coder0xff@gmail.com>"]
edition = "2021"
resolver = "2"
rust-version = "1.71"

[profile.release]
opt-level = "s"

[profile.dev]
debug = true    # Symbols are nice and they don't increase the size on Flash
opt-level = "z"

[features]
default = ["std", "embassy", "esp-idf-svc/native"]

pio = ["esp-idf-svc/pio"]
std = ["alloc", "esp-idf-svc/binstart", "esp-idf-svc/std"]
alloc = ["esp-idf-svc/alloc"]
nightly = ["esp-idf-svc/nightly"]
experimental = ["esp-idf-svc/experimental"]
embassy = ["esp-idf-svc/embassy-sync", "esp-idf-svc/critical-section", "esp-idf-svc/embassy-time-driver"]

[dependencies]
log = { version = "0.4", default-features = false }
esp-idf-svc = { version = "0.48", default-features = false }
ring = { features = ["alloc", "less-safe-getrandom-espidf"] }

[patch.crates-io]
ring = { path = "../ring" }

[build-dependencies]
embuild = "0.31.3"

Contents of: .gitignore

/.vscode
/.embuild
/target
/Cargo.lock

Contents of: rust-toolchain.toml

[toolchain]
channel = "esp"

Contents of: sdkconfig.defaults

# Rust often needs a bit of an extra main task stack size compared to C (the default is 3K)
CONFIG_ESP_MAIN_TASK_STACK_SIZE=8000

# Use this to set FreeRTOS kernel tick frequency to 1000 Hz (100 Hz by default).
# This allows to use 1 ms granuality for thread sleeps (10 ms by default).
#CONFIG_FREERTOS_HZ=1000

# Workaround for https://github.com/espressif/esp-idf/issues/7631
#CONFIG_MBEDTLS_CERTIFICATE_BUNDLE=n
#CONFIG_MBEDTLS_CERTIFICATE_BUNDLE_DEFAULT_FULL=n

Contents of: src/main.rs

fn main() {
    // It is necessary to call this function once. Otherwise some patches to the runtime
    // implemented by esp-idf-sys might not link properly. See https://github.com/esp-rs/esp-idf-template/issues/71
    esp_idf_svc::sys::link_patches();

    // Bind the log crate to the ESP Logging facilities
    esp_idf_svc::log::EspLogger::initialize_default();

    log::info!("Hello, world!");
}

@coder0xff
Copy link
Contributor Author

@briansmith Does everything look good?

@coder0xff
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi. Would you please trigger the workflows?

@briansmith briansmith merged commit 89a93d8 into briansmith:main May 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants