Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allowed use of zero eigensamples in DenoiseReadCounts. #4411

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2018

Conversation

samuelklee
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #4399.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 14, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #4411 into master will increase coverage by 0.004%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##              master     #4411       +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage     79.024%   79.027%   +0.004%     
  Complexity     16447     16447               
===============================================
  Files           1047      1047               
  Lines          59186     59187        +1     
  Branches        9672      9671        -1     
===============================================
+ Hits           46771     46774        +3     
+ Misses          8659      8658        -1     
+ Partials        3756      3755        -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...hellbender/tools/copynumber/DenoiseReadCounts.java 91.892% <ø> (+2.418%) 10 <0> (-1) ⬇️
.../tools/copynumber/denoising/SVDDenoisingUtils.java 79.13% <100%> (+0.183%) 45 <3> (+1) ⬆️
...utils/smithwaterman/SmithWatermanIntelAligner.java 90% <0%> (+10%) 3% <0%> (ø) ⬇️

@samuelklee
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mbabadi I need this to run something for @mwalker174. OK to merge?

Copy link
Contributor

@mbabadi mbabadi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

g2g!

@samuelklee samuelklee merged commit 9eb1704 into master Mar 5, 2018
@samuelklee samuelklee deleted the sl_zero_num_eigen branch March 5, 2018 20:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants