Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added a gene_statistics output to DepthOfCoverage #7025
added a gene_statistics output to DepthOfCoverage #7025
Changes from all commits
eb322a5
b4209bb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Have you verified that this output is reasonable given the truth in this case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also, is this new file actually referenced in any test code?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it gets pulled in automatically by the test suite along with any other files with the
testGeneListDataAllCovered
name and tested for exact concordance against the actual output. As for the plausibility of the results. The look reasonable, that file has 18 genes (16 of which are actually covered by the region) and 6 samples. I have not tired asking the question "how many of these genes are completely covered to x depth across y samples" by hand however.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jamesemery Would it be possible to spot-check a few genes in IGV?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just checked these. All 6 of the samples in this file have pretty uniform coverage around the 30-40x mark across this entire region. If you look the last row of this graph asserts that you are able to get an average coverage of at least 32 reads for all 6 samples at all 16 gene sites. Looking through IGV that certainly looks correct and is in line with the other output files in this test.