Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(control): add abi feature to everscale types #602

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

serejkaaa512
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Rexagon Rexagon force-pushed the fix/control-abi-feat branch from 84625d6 to 8ffbc3e Compare February 21, 2025 14:27
@Rexagon Rexagon requested review from Rexagon and 0xdeafbeef and removed request for Rexagon February 21, 2025 14:27
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 11 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 42.86%. Comparing base (28c8444) to head (8ffbc3e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
control/src/server.rs 0.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
control/src/client.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #602      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   42.87%   42.86%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         278      278              
  Lines       51882    51891       +9     
  Branches    51882    51891       +9     
==========================================
- Hits        22243    22242       -1     
- Misses      28477    28482       +5     
- Partials     1162     1167       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Rexagon Rexagon added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 65b6dbb Feb 21, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@Rexagon Rexagon deleted the fix/control-abi-feat branch February 21, 2025 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants