-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add new command: pack sbom download #1351
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great direction!
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1351 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 81.47% 81.42% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 148 151 +3
Lines 9598 9657 +59
==========================================
+ Hits 7819 7862 +43
- Misses 1313 1327 +14
- Partials 466 468 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
Use: "download-sbom <image-name>", | ||
Args: cobra.ExactArgs(1), | ||
Short: "Download SBoM from specified image", | ||
Long: "Download layer containing Structured Bill of Materials (SBoM) from specified image", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this sbom downloading only work for "app" images? Not run images?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Once again, are you referring to buildpacks/rfcs#186? As of today, this RFC hasn't been approved and it might be a pre-optimization to implement in light of this.
e6ab64f
to
f027b65
Compare
@aemengo @dfreilich any updates on this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Spectacular! Just a few nits I'd like to see changed, but overall this really worked like a charm!
UA
> ./out/pack sbom
Interact with SBoM
Usage:
pack sbom [command]
Available Commands:
download Download SBoM from specified image
Flags:
-h, --help Help for 'sbom'
Global Flags:
--no-color Disable color output
-q, --quiet Show less output
--timestamps Enable timestamps in output
-v, --verbose Show more output
Use "pack sbom [command] --help" for more information about a command.
> ./out/pack sbom download
Error: accepts 1 arg(s), received 0
Usage:
pack sbom download <image-name> [flags]
Examples:
pack sbom download buildpacksio/pack
Flags:
-h, --help Help for 'download'
--local Pull SBoM from local daemon (Default)
--output-dir string Path to export SBoM contents.
It defaults export to the current working directory. (default ".")
--remote Pull SBoM from remote registry
Global Flags:
--no-color Disable color output
-q, --quiet Show less output
--timestamps Enable timestamps in output
-v, --verbose Show more output
sbom download
on image without an SbOM
> ./out/pack sbom download buildpacksio/pack --remote --output-dir /tmp/pack-sbom
ERROR: could not find SBoM information on 'buildpacksio/pack'
> docker images | grep buildpacksio/pack
sbom download
on image with it, from remote registry
> ./out/pack sbom download aemengo/hello --remote --output-dir /tmp/sbom-hello
> tree /tmp/sbom-hello
/tmp/sbom-hello
└── layers
└── sbom
└── launch
└── paketo-buildpacks_ca-certificates
└── helper
└── sbom.syft.json
5 directories, 1 file
> cat /tmp/sbom-hello/layers/sbom/launch/paketo-buildpacks_ca-certificates/helper/sbom.syft.json
{"Artifacts":[{"ID":"b4a6352954da741c","Name":"helper","Version":"3.0.1","Type":"UnknownPackage","FoundBy":"libpak","Locations":[{"Path":"ca-certificates-helper"}],"Licenses":["Apache-2.0"],"Language":"","CPEs":["cpe:2.3:a:paketo-buildpacks/ca-certificates:ca-certificates-helper:3.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"PURL":"pkg:generic/paketo-buildpacks/ca-certificates@3.0.1"}],"Source":{"Type":"directory","Target":"/layers/paketo-buildpacks_ca-certificates/helper"},"Descriptor":{"Name":"syft","Version":"0.30.1"},"Schema":{"Version":"1.1.0","URL":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/anchore/syft/main/schema/json/schema-1.1.0.json"}}%
sbom download
from local image
> ./out/pack sbom download test --output-dir /tmp/pack-sbom
> tree /tmp/pack-sbom
/tmp/pack-sbom
└── layers
└── sbom
└── launch
└── paketo-buildpacks_ca-certificates
└── helper
└── sbom.syft.json
small nitpick - should we rename the command to |
Signed-off-by: Anthony Emengo <aemengo@vmware.com>
- pack download-sbom -> pack sbom download .... - Add warning message for pack inspect-image <> --bom - Remove --local flag - Add -o shorthand for --output-dir flag Signed-off-by: Anthony Emengo <aemengo@vmware.com>
f027b65
to
7db1ac5
Compare
I have no strong feelings. @dfreilich Can you confirm that this is what you'd prefer? |
I actually think |
Was just a nit pick, don't mind either way. At this point I am just eagerly waiting for this release! Thanks for working on this @aemengo! |
Summary
Add command to download image SBOM to specified directory
Documentation
Related
#1335