Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add --flatten, --depth and flatten-exclude flags to pack builder create and pack buildpack package command #1691

Merged
merged 53 commits into from
May 13, 2023

Conversation

jjbustamante
Copy link
Member

@jjbustamante jjbustamante commented Mar 29, 2023

Summary

This PR adds new flags to:

  • pack builder create
  • pack buildpack package

The flags will try to flatten the layers in the final image.

for both commands the following flags were added:

      --depth int                   Max depth to flatten compose buildpacks layers.
                                    Omission of this flag or values < 0 will flatten the entire tree. (default -1)
      --flatten                     Flatten the composite buildpacks layers
  -e, --flatten-exclude strings     Buildpack to exclude for being flatten. Use buildpack by id and version in the form of '<buildpack>@<version>'

These flags can be used with the following combinations:

  • --flatten only OR with --depth < 0: it will flatten ALL the buildpacks layers into 1 final layer, because the default value for --depth is < 0
  • --flatten and --depth = 1: it will flatten only the top level of composites to be flattened (i.e. composites directly referenced from either the builder or directly referenced from a composite if building a buildpack)
  • --flatten and --depth = 2: it will flatten the top 2 levels of composites buildpacks

And so on

In case the users want to EXCLUDE some buildpacks for being flatten, they can use the --flatten-exclude flag in combination with the previous one to exclude any buildpack they want. The buildpack MUST be specify using the format flatten-exclude '<buildpack>@<version>'

Example

For testing the feature I used the buildpacks defined in our sample repository and a builder.toml with the following content:

# Buildpacks to include in builder
[[buildpacks]]
uri = "samples/buildpacks/hello-processes"

[[buildpacks]]
# Packaged buildpacks to include in builder;
# the "hello-universe" package contains the "hello-world" and "hello-moon" buildpacks
uri = "docker://cnbs/sample-package:hello-universe"

# Order used for detection
[[order]]
    # This buildpack will display build-time information (as a dependency)
    [[order.group]]
    id = "samples/hello-world"
    version = "0.0.1"

    # This buildpack will display build-time information (as a dependant)
    [[order.group]]
    id = "samples/hello-moon"
    version = "0.0.1"

    # This buildpack will create a process type "sys-info" to display runtime information
    [[order.group]]
    id = "samples/hello-processes"
    version = "0.0.1"

# Stack that will be used by the builder
[stack]
id = "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.bionic"
# This image is used at runtime
run-image = "cnbs/sample-stack-run:bionic"
# This image is used at build-time
build-image = "cnbs/sample-stack-build:bionic"

Graphically we can imagine the example as follow

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4 09 51 PM

Output

$ pack builder create cnbs/sample-builder:alpine --config builder.toml --flatten

Here we can see all the buildpacks were flatten into one layer:

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4 14 12 PM

$ pack builder create cnbs/sample-builder:alpine --config builder.toml --flatten --depth 0

It will flatten the hello-universe in one layer and

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4 16 14 PM

And the hello-processes in another layer

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4 16 59 PM

But if we want to EXCLUDE we can do

$ pack builder create cnbs/sample-builder:alpine --config builder.toml --verbose --flatten --depth 0 --flatten-exclude samples/hello-world@0.0.1

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4 20 01 PM

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4 20 12 PM

Screenshot 2023-04-20 at 4 20 40 PM

Metadata

Inspecting the metadata io.buildpacks.buildpack.layers

> docker inspect cnbs/sample-builder:alpine | jq '.[] | .Config.Labels | ."io.buildpacks.buildpack.layers" | fromjson'

shows the layerDiffID value is the same for the squashed buildpacks

{
  "samples/hello-extensions": {
    "0.0.1": {
      "api": "0.9",
      "stacks": [
        {
          "id": "*"
        }
      ],
      "layerDiffID": "sha256:baf4f7c28c15dbaadc953bb6d98ce9e83473e842fe92956ea2a328495237ddfc",
      "homepage": "https://github.com/buildpacks/samples/tree/main/buildpacks/hello-extensions",
      "name": "Hello Extensions Buildpack"
    }
  },
  "samples/hello-moon": {
    "0.0.1": {
      "api": "0.2",
      "stacks": [
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.jammy"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.alpine"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.stacks.jammy"
        },
        {
          "id": "*"
        }
      ],
      "layerDiffID": "sha256:4ad60d1ea1836600073b50ae066e946068fdba9babbee257d3584cbe1ceb9cb7",
      "homepage": "https://github.com/buildpacks/samples/tree/main/buildpacks/hello-moon",
      "name": "Hello Moon Buildpack"
    }
  },
  "samples/hello-universe": {
    "0.0.1": {
      "api": "0.2",
      "order": [
        {
          "group": [
            {
              "id": "samples/hello-world",
              "version": "0.0.1"
            },
            {
              "id": "samples/hello-moon",
              "version": "0.0.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "layerDiffID": "sha256:4ad60d1ea1836600073b50ae066e946068fdba9babbee257d3584cbe1ceb9cb7",
      "homepage": "https://github.com/buildpacks/samples/tree/main/buildpacks/hello-universe",
      "name": "Hello Universe Buildpack"
    }
  },
  "samples/hello-world": {
    "0.0.1": {
      "api": "0.2",
      "stacks": [
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.jammy"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.alpine"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.stacks.jammy"
        },
        {
          "id": "*"
        }
      ],
      "layerDiffID": "sha256:4ad60d1ea1836600073b50ae066e946068fdba9babbee257d3584cbe1ceb9cb7",
      "homepage": "https://github.com/buildpacks/samples/tree/main/buildpacks/hello-world",
      "name": "Hello World Buildpack"
    }
  },
  "samples/java-maven": {
    "0.0.1": {
      "api": "0.2",
      "stacks": [
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.jammy"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.alpine"
        },
        {
          "id": "*"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.stacks.jammy",
          "mixins": [
            "build:set=shell-utils"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "layerDiffID": "sha256:a74e11d973b550235a0f9f1041bdeb0d810d20f5f646a53465d812a925c8b671",
      "homepage": "https://github.com/buildpacks/samples/tree/main/buildpacks/java-maven",
      "name": "Sample Java Maven Buildpack"
    }
  },
  "samples/kotlin-gradle": {
    "0.0.1": {
      "api": "0.2",
      "stacks": [
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.jammy"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.samples.stacks.alpine"
        },
        {
          "id": "*"
        },
        {
          "id": "io.buildpacks.stacks.jammy",
          "mixins": [
            "build:set=shell-utils"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "layerDiffID": "sha256:5511b6ad86c688fc70ef7056a21f7dcf82eff299c9e03d05cfb8dc47c7e37b90",
      "homepage": "https://github.com/buildpacks/samples/tree/main/buildpacks/kotlin-gradle",
      "name": "Sample Kotlin Gradle Buildpack"
    }
  }
}

Note: pack buildpack package has a similar behavior

Before

When the pack builder create is executed without the flag, each buildpack is added into a different layer

Documentation

  • Should this change be documented?
    • Yes, see #___
    • No

Related

Resolves #1595

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/enhancement Issue that requests a new feature or improvement. label Mar 29, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 0.30.0 milestone Mar 29, 2023
@jjbustamante jjbustamante changed the title Add --flatten-layers to pack builder create command Add --flatten-layers flag to pack builder create command Mar 29, 2023
@jjbustamante jjbustamante force-pushed the enhancement/issue-1595-layer-compression-flattening branch from da60304 to 1639f9d Compare April 3, 2023 20:08
@jjbustamante jjbustamante marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2023 20:50
@jjbustamante jjbustamante requested review from a team as code owners April 4, 2023 20:50
@jjbustamante
Copy link
Member Author

I still need to work in the unit test coverage, and probably I will like to refactor a little bit more, but I think in general the PR is ready for review.

Another thing I need to take a look is adding the depth flag Natalie mentioned.

@jjbustamante jjbustamante changed the title Add --flatten-layers flag to pack builder create command Add --flatten-meta-buildpacks and flatten-all flag to pack builder create and pack buildpack package command Apr 4, 2023
@natalieparellano
Copy link
Member

I want to bikeshed a little bit about the --flatten-meta-buildpacks flag name. I think technically according to our terminology it should be --flatten-composite-buildpacks. If we do --depth we might only need --flatten.

@jkutner
Copy link
Member

jkutner commented Apr 11, 2023

I agree with @natalieparellano on --flatten-composite-buildpacks. But I didn't understand the --depth comment.

Also, is "flatten" common terminology for this? It feels more like "merge" or "combine". but if flatten is used in other places that's fine.

@jjbustamante
Copy link
Member Author

jjbustamante commented Apr 11, 2023

I agree with @natalieparellano on --flatten-composite-buildpacks. But I didn't understand the --depth comment.

Also, is "flatten" common terminology for this? It feels more like "merge" or "combine". but if flatten is used in other places that's fine.

Natalie's depth comments is here

"flatten" is used by crane for example:

$ crane flatten --help
Flatten an image's layers into a single layer

Usage:
  crane flatten [flags]

Flags:
  -h, --help         help for flatten
  -t, --tag string   New tag to apply to flattened image. If not provided, push by digest to the original image repository.

Global Flags:
      --allow-nondistributable-artifacts   Allow pushing non-distributable (foreign) layers
      --insecure                           Allow image references to be fetched without TLS
      --platform platform                  Specifies the platform in the form os/arch[/variant][:osversion] (e.g. linux/amd64). (default all)
  -v, --verbose                            Enable debug logs

Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
@jjbustamante jjbustamante force-pushed the enhancement/issue-1595-layer-compression-flattening branch from f33ff35 to bef7256 Compare April 14, 2023 14:41
@jkutner
Copy link
Member

jkutner commented Apr 14, 2023

@jjbustamante do you mind if we hold this until after 0.30.0-pre2?

@jjbustamante
Copy link
Member Author

jjbustamante commented Apr 14, 2023

@jjbustamante do you mind if we hold this until after 0.30.0-pre2?

No problem, I am going to draft the PR again, because I am checking Nataliee's feedback

@jjbustamante jjbustamante marked this pull request as draft April 14, 2023 22:47
@jjbustamante jjbustamante self-assigned this Apr 14, 2023
@natalieparellano
Copy link
Member

@jjbustamante amazing work - the code seems well tested and appears to do what it sets out to do :) I added a few suggestions to hopefully improve the readability a bit, but the only that are truly blocking are:

Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
@jjbustamante
Copy link
Member Author

@jjbustamante amazing work - the code seems well tested and appears to do what it sets out to do :) I added a few suggestions to hopefully improve the readability a bit, but the only that are truly blocking are:

Thanks for this amazing feedback @natalieparellano ❤️ .. I just added some of them, I will take a look on the Windows support and the remaining suggestions! ..

Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
@jkutner
Copy link
Member

jkutner commented May 10, 2023

I'm reviewing this today

Signed-off-by: Juan Bustamante <jbustamante@vmware.com>
@jjbustamante
Copy link
Member Author

I'm reviewing this today

Thanks @jkutner, I just added some TODO to add more test coverage as @natalieparellano suggested, but the important things for me to fix are the Windows support and the improvement in the flatten-exclude flag to avoid compressing a composite buildpack and its dependencies without having to explicitly add the dependencies with the flag.

As we talk in the leadership meeting, I like the strategy for merging this PR to include it in the next pre-release, and I will create a new PR with the improvements mentioned above.

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
api = "0.3"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are you using buildpack api 0.3 on purpose in these?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really. I think I copied and paste from another similar file

@jkutner jkutner merged commit 987f4be into main May 13, 2023
@jkutner jkutner deleted the enhancement/issue-1595-layer-compression-flattening branch May 13, 2023 19:10
arjun024 added a commit to paketo-buildpacks/jam that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2023
With platforms introducing the ability to create flattened
buildpackages[1], the idea of 1 layer = 1 buildpack is not always true
anymore - a single layer can contain multiple buildpacks.
This change adds to the inspector the ability to read buildpack
metadata off flattened buildpacks.

This fixes "jam summarize" when creating summary/release notes
for flattened buildpacks. Previously it picked up the first
buildpack.toml it could find in the layer, and assumed it to represent
the buildpackage.

[1]: buildpacks/pack#1691
arjun024 added a commit to paketo-buildpacks/jam that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
With platforms introducing the ability to create flattened
buildpackages[1], the idea of 1 layer = 1 buildpack is not always true
anymore - a single layer can contain multiple buildpacks.
This change adds to the inspector the ability to read buildpack
metadata off flattened buildpacks.

This fixes "jam summarize" when creating summary/release notes
for flattened buildpacks. Previously it picked up the first
buildpack.toml it could find in the layer, and assumed it to represent
the buildpackage.

[1]: buildpacks/pack#1691
sophiewigmore pushed a commit to paketo-buildpacks/jam that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
With platforms introducing the ability to create flattened
buildpackages[1], the idea of 1 layer = 1 buildpack is not always true
anymore - a single layer can contain multiple buildpacks.
This change adds to the inspector the ability to read buildpack
metadata off flattened buildpacks.

This fixes "jam summarize" when creating summary/release notes
for flattened buildpacks. Previously it picked up the first
buildpack.toml it could find in the layer, and assumed it to represent
the buildpackage.

[1]: buildpacks/pack#1691
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/enhancement Issue that requests a new feature or improvement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Layer compression/flattening
5 participants