Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Expose cranelift nan canonicalization config via C API #4154

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2022
Merged

Expose cranelift nan canonicalization config via C API #4154

merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2022

Conversation

ok-ul-ch
Copy link
Contributor

Been discussed as part of bytecodealliance/wasmtime-dotnet#109

@ok-ul-ch ok-ul-ch mentioned this pull request May 14, 2022
Closed
@github-actions github-actions bot added the wasmtime:c-api Issues pertaining to the C API. label May 14, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

Subscribe to Label Action

cc @peterhuene

This issue or pull request has been labeled: "wasmtime:c-api"

Thus the following users have been cc'd because of the following labels:

  • peterhuene: wasmtime:c-api

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this label, edit the .github/subscribe-to-label.json configuration file.

Learn more.

@ok-ul-ch ok-ul-ch mentioned this pull request May 14, 2022
Merged
peterhuene
peterhuene approved these changes May 14, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@peterhuene peterhuene left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mralexes thanks for adding this to the C API!

@peterhuene peterhuene merged commit 8d7bcce into bytecodealliance:main May 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@peterhuene peterhuene peterhuene approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
wasmtime:c-api Issues pertaining to the C API.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@ok-ul-ch @peterhuene