Source paragraph does not honor syntax highlighter

[gdamore]

We emit the highlighter ("pygments", which is a kind of lie) on the class for listingblocks that come via a source-block, but not those coming from a source-paragraph.

This is almost certainly an oversight. (And also possibly related to #703 -- i.e. fixing #703 will probably resolve this, provided that we resolve in favor of the syntax highlighter.)

[xcoulon]

Agree with you, there are probably areas where the syntax highlighting is not supported yet 😬

From the the Chroma project page:

Chroma is based heavily on Pygments, and includes translators for Pygments lexers and styles."

So it's not totally a "lie" ;) And it provides compatibility with Asciidoctor.

[gdamore]

Yeah chroma seems nice, and CSS compatible with pygments. But it's not pygments. We probably should offer an alias of chroma -- if only to give credit where it's due to the chroma author(s). (I'd argue that chroma should be the preferred name, pygments accepted as an alias, actually.)

[xcoulon]

yes, that's a fair point 👍
we should clarify this and support "chroma" as a syntax highlighter choice indeed.
I've opened #706 for that.