feat(scripts): allow custom interpreters

[rawkode]

Closes #907

[domenkozar]

binary sounds good!

…

On Sat, Jun 8, 2024, 14:15 David Flanagan ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In src/modules/scripts.nix <#1256 (comment)>: > - type = types.str; - description = "Bash code to execute when the script is run."; - }; - description = lib.mkOption { - type = types.str; - description = "Description of the script."; - default = ""; + scriptType = types.submodule ( + { config, ... }: + { + options = { + exec = lib.mkOption { + type = types.str; + description = "Shell code to execute when the script is run."; + }; + interpreter = lib.mkOption { No problem. Are you happy with binary, or is there a convention there too? Bin? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1256 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA63AZHAW2BKKXWA62EVVTZGLYWPAVCNFSM6AAAAABI735EVKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMZDCMBVHAZTSMRYGE> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[rawkode]

Oops. I'm using the wrong formatter I think

[domenkozar]

@rawkode seems like you need to run pre-commit run -a

[rawkode]

@domenkozar I'm learning. Should be sorted now. Thanks for the assist.

[domenkozar]

No worries, that's why I'm here to help :)